My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/09/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2002
>
Agenda - Council - 07/09/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 11:09:26 AM
Creation date
9/3/2003 2:05:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/09/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chairperson Nixt pointed out text is missing from Section 1, subd. 1 under Purpose. He <br />suggested the words "in the MUSA" should be added. <br /> <br />He stated it seems inconsistent that there is no density transitioning between Multi-Family <br />developments (townhomes and apartments) and Single Family Urban lots. He also noted that <br />"urban" and "rural" is not defined and that the old zoning designations (RI-U, RI-R) are <br />contained in the proposed ordinance· He questioned how urban is defined ~¢s <br /> rural. <br /> He <br />stated that the City should not be using the MUSA line as the definition of mr~;,~d urban. He <br />stated that including clarification of how it applies would be to a chart <br />on Page 55 and questioned the meaning of "Options to Achieving ........ He stated that <br />there is not enough buffering proposed in the section under "a. Defi~f~i~S Buffer <br />Yards." <br /> <br />Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Commission~er to recommend ty <br />Council adoption of the density transition ordinance, s~.ubj~,~{~ to addre,s~i~ng the ini . es <br />and ambiguities noted, particularly regarding the transi etween ~'~'density units, and the <br /> · . '~:~.::£~_ ~.~ <br />defimt~on of urban versus rural., <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissio muer and Reeve. Voting No: <br />Commissioner Kociscak. Absent: CommiS~i~i/stohnson, Swe ,~,Watson. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon stated he wiii?7}:kring {h~: i~:~es,,up G~' discussion, He also <br />acknowledged the language needs <br /> <br />OTHER COMMISSIOn.BUS,ESS <br /> <br />1) App(3i~bnt~_by ~I~a~)!of Planning Commission Member to the Environmental Task <br /> <br />MOfi~n by Chairperson N~k secondgd by Commissioner Reeve to appoint Commissioner Ralph <br />Brauerto the Environmer~f~JTask Force. <br /> <br />Motion C~ed. VotingtYes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Reeve, Brauer, and Kociscak. <br />Voting No'i~:~0he, AB~rif: Commissioners Johnson, Sweet, and Watson· <br /> <br />ADJOURNMENT' <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />-I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Kociscak, seconded by Commissioner Reeve, to adjourn the meeting. <br /> <br />-42- <br /> <br />Planning Commission/June 6, 2002 <br /> Page 14 of 15 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.