My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/25/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2002
>
Agenda - Council - 06/25/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 11:09:16 AM
Creation date
9/3/2003 2:13:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/25/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
365
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />homeowners and developers. He stated that the City has to have ordinances in place that control <br />builders on the custom lots as well as the homeowners, which is why development of the <br />peninsula should be put on hold. He stated that the City has already seen what Mr. Black's <br />intentions are so he hoped that they would not let that happen again. <br /> <br />Motion was withdrawn. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Zimmerman, seconded by Councilmember Hendriksen, to halt further <br />tree removal by Royal Oaks within the peninsula until a tree preservation ordinance is in place. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Councilmember Anderson inquired if the motion would be in conflict with <br />approving the final plat. City Attorney Goodrich replied no. He also noted that the Council could <br />direct that the development agreement be amended to include Mr. Black's language that removal <br />of the trees would be limited to the street fight of way and building pads only along the peninsula. <br />Councilmember Kurak inquired if the Council places restrictions on one developer in the City do <br />they have to apply them to other developers. City Attorney Goodrich replied that any plat in the <br />future would have to be pending to a tree ordinance. Councilmember Kurak inquired if any <br />development that would come forward would not be able to receive final plat approval if a tree <br />needed to be removed. City Attorney Goodrich replied that all developers should be held to the <br />same standards. Councilmember Zimmerman noted that some developments might not have <br />trees. Councilmember Hendriksen stated that his next motion would be to direct staff to prepare <br />for the next City Council agenda a development.moratorium on any plat that includes the cutting <br />of trees and hold all developers to the same standards. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Councilmembers Zimmerman, Hendriksen, and Anderson. Voting <br />No: Mayor Gamec and Councilmember Kurak. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Hendriksen, seconded by Councilmember Zimmerman, to direct staff <br />to prepare a development moratorium for discussion at the next City Council meeting that would <br />be placed' in affect for any plat requiring the cutting of trees until they can study the issue and <br />bring forward a tree preservation ordinance. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Councilmember Zimmerman stated that it should exclude lots that would not <br />be applicable. Councilmember Hendriksen stated that there were 12 or 14 changes to the <br />Comprehensive Plan, which include areas with a substantial amount of trees and most requests <br />were for a higher density so he thought it was appropriate they prepare the moratorium for the <br />next Council meeting. <br /> <br />Motion failed. Voting Yes: Councilmembers Hendriksen, and Zimmerman. Voting No: Mayor <br />Gamec, Councilmembers Anderson, and Kurak. <br /> <br />City Council/May 14, 2002 <br /> Page 10 of 33 <br /> <br />-179- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.