My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/25/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2002
>
Agenda - Council - 06/25/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 11:09:16 AM
Creation date
9/3/2003 2:13:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/25/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
365
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-214- <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon explained that most of the trees exist around the existing house with <br />some scattered trees on the property. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson stated that this would be the time to address the issue on trees if they <br />want to have a stronger stand. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon stated that the developer is meeting the minimum standards required <br />in City Code. He did not believe that there had been any discussion with the developer regarding <br />the preservation of trees. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec inquired if there would be a berm along T.H. ~47. <br /> <br />Mark Strandlund, Eighty Seven LLC, stated that they will be planting maple trees, crab apple <br />trees, and spruce trees on the properly for a total of 51 trees. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson inquired as to what the recommendation has been of the Chapter 9 <br />Committee regarding trees within a townhome development. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon replied that the Chapter 9 Committee was recommending two trees <br />per unit and six shrubs per tree. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak inquired as to how that would compare to this development. <br /> <br />Mr. Strandlund replied that they were proposing 300 shrubs as welt as saving many of the spruce <br />trees along the pond. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson noted that if the tree requirement is changed 84 trees would be <br />required for the development. <br /> <br />Mr. Strandlund replied that they would not be against adding more trees as long as they will fit. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon noted that typically the amount of trees to be placed on the site is a <br />site plan issue. And removal of trees is a preliminary plat issue. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated that the existing trees on the property are not numerous or <br />valuable. In this case the addition of larger trees would counter act where they have taken them <br />out. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson stated that she would like to be closer to 84 trees rather than 51. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec recommended compromising at 65 trees. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak inquired if that would be an issue that would be addressed as part of this <br />case. <br /> <br />City Council/May 14, 2002 <br />Page 17 of 33 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.