Laserfiche WebLink
-266- <br /> <br />Commission Business <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt called the regular meeting of the Planning Commission back to order at 9:57 <br />p.m. <br /> <br />Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Commissioner Kociscak, to recommend that City <br />Council approve the proposed preliminary plat for Sunfish Gateway contingent_! compliance <br />with City Staff'Review Letter dated May 31, 2002. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners and Reeve. <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Johnson, Sweet, and <br />Community Development Director Frolik suggested Case #~:~oved to the and <br />Case ~4 be moved to the last item. <br /> <br />Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Commission~]Kociscak to~O~e Case #5 to Case #4, <br />and move Case ~k; to Case #7, renumbering the rest acc~'~'gly. <br />Motion .Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson=Nixt, Commissio~b~ ;pciscak, Brauer, and Reeve. <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners47}~'~on,..S~eet, and <br />PLANNING COMxMISSION BUSLNESS '! i:':~: .... 5~i(;.]::;':,:~.,, <br />Case #4: Request for Sketch Plan Appf0,Val~:~"~ongfietd'~ot Split; Case of Robert & <br /> <br />Motion by Chaimer~]$1xt, second~ by Co~'~oner rocisc~ to table ~s item until the <br />Jul <br /> Plan <br /> <br />Motion C~ed. VotN~:Ye~7]'~ai~son 'Nixt, Co~issi0ners Kocisc~, Brauer, ~d Reeve. <br />Voting No:~5~5]Absent: 'C~5~ission~s Jonson, Sweet, and Watson. <br /> <br />Cise;~5: Request'for~'Site PIan Renew of T.J. & Associates Prating; Case of Sharp <br /> ~' ~ and Assoe~tes, L.L.C. <br /> <br />Presen~:~. <br /> <br />Co--umw D'eV~10~nt Director Frolik stated that the CiW received ~ applicgion from Sha~ <br />~d Associmes, ~5E~C. for ~e development of T.J. & Associmes Printing. ~ey ~e proposing to <br />locate on Lot 3, Block 1, of Sunfish Gateway. ~e development of the lot will be contingent <br />upon final plat approval of Sunfish Gateway. ~e site plan is proposing to construct a 2-stow, <br />18,886 square foot printing faciliW. ~e site plan complies with the front yard, re~ yard, ~d <br />side yard setbacks established in the Industrial District. %e Indus~al district resMcts lot <br /> <br />Planning Commission/June 6, 2002 <br /> Page 10 of 15 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I: <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />