Laserfiche WebLink
Final Site Plan Review -Suite Living at The COR <br />December 8, 2010 <br />Page 6 of 10 <br />Engineering Review <br />Reviewer: Tim Himmer, City Engineer <br />thimmer (dci. ramsev. mn. us <br />763 - 433 -9893 <br />The following comments are offered regarding the December 3, 2010 plans by Landform <br />Engineering Company: <br />Grading and Drainage: The building floor elevation should be set to be above the adjacent <br />grade of the public streets while meeting ADA accessibility guidelines. The grade from the <br />building to the property lines and extending to the limits of the shared accesses must be set to <br />match the plans for the future improvements. There appears to be discrepancies between the <br />overflow locations along the west side of the building and the landscape plan; care should be <br />taken to ensure that installed plant material does not restrict flow through this area or flooding <br />concerns could be realized. <br />The COR Development utilizes regional stormwater ponds for rate control and water quality <br />treatment. Each individual site needs to provide additional water quality treatment through the <br />use of rain gardens, water quality treatment structures, or other BMP's. The plan is proposing to <br />install a conventional storm sewer system (inlet structures and pipes) with the east half of the site <br />discharging to a proposed design on the adjacent Residence at the COR property and ultimately <br />to the public system, and the west half directed into the public system in Sunwood Drive. <br />Drainage calculations were received but additional information is required for the appropriate <br />sizing of the proposed treatment structure /manhole at the discharge points (Ecostorm structure). The <br />model was developed showing this structure as a reach, and therefore no outlet pipe sizing was provided <br />at the tie -in to the public system; this info must be incorporated into the model to justify treatment <br />structure sizing and removal efficiencies, and resubmitted for review prior to issuance of a building <br />permit. The model must also be revised to account for CB overflow and ponding in the low areas of the <br />parking lot and green space. Additional BMP's should also be considered and investigated to <br />provide for some rate control and lessen the need for downstream piping/structure sizing, and <br />reduce the volume of water leaving the site. While the revised plans provide spot elevations and call <br />out overflow points to explain drainage patterns, the model does not provide the same level of detail and <br />must be revised accordingly, including the 100 year event. <br />With the proposed coordinated storm sewer effort between this project and the Residence at the <br />COR to the east; private cross drainage easements will be required to outline responsibilities of <br />each entity as it relates to ownership, maintenance, etc. All proposed contours must be tied into <br />existing contours of the surrounding area, and extend 100' beyond the property limits. Since the <br />development of lots 3, and 4 are interrelated with regards to constructability and drainage, future <br />revisions to the plans should include an overlap of the grading plans. <br />A maintenance agreement will be required for the overall system to ensure timely maintenance <br />and performance to the intended design. <br />The proposed site storm sewer connection into the existing public system in the right -of -way must <br />be constructed with RCP pipe; no PVC or HDPE is allowed. The model must also be submitted to City <br />