Laserfiche WebLink
-34- <br /> <br />Case #10: <br /> <br />Request for Preliminary Plat Review of Wildlife Sanctuary 2"d Addition; <br />Case of Oakwood Land Development <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt closed the regular portion of the Planning Commission meeting at 9:22 p.m. in <br />order to call the public hearing to order. <br /> <br />Public Hearing <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt called the public hearing to order at 9:22 p.m. ,,:.:/ii}.,,.?; ,,~::i:!:!.i~;¥,~., <br />P r e s e n t a ti o n ..~;~: .' ''':;?':~ <br />Associate Planner Wald stated Oakwood Land Developme~-~ISas applied for prelimina~":plat <br />review to replat Lots 1 and 2 of Wildlife Sanctuary Add[ti(~n)~:~cated westof State <br />The property is located within the MUSA boundary ~ i:~.~d is el!gib~?for develop, ment,with, <br />municipal sewer and water services. The 2002 Comi~hbnsiv¢'~iPl~an designates me subject <br />property for low-density urban residential development and'~'b~:~eh~ity has been established at 3 <br />un/ts per acre. The subject property is 31.66~acres in size. TheiPr-,.~hminary plat is proposing to <br />subdivide the subject property into 42 singie:~a~ly lots for a n~i~'~i~y of 2.01 units per acre. <br />The proposed lots meet the minimum stan~dard 'forji0~ti.are~ and lot'~5. The sub&vm~on IS <br />proposing to gain access from State Highway ~47 by the ~extension of 1~5"6 Lane. She said Staff <br />anticipates that ~4n~ot will require State Ui~h~y ~4~ ~0-~¢:~:'~aded to include left and hght <br />turn lanes. The preliminary p~at. is~providing tv~Ocur~d~Zsacs into the development that meet the <br />cul-de-sac length restr/ction~:'~tablished in City COde". An access to the south has been provided <br />to facilitate redevelopment'of the reri/ainder of Wi~dI~£e Sanctuary Addition. <br /> <br />~M_r. Pererson referenced'Mr.:-Cfil s comments and they have done a title exam and there is <br />nothing i~ ~epi~]~lic record:.~S-it relates to the issue of whether the land can be developed. He <br />added, t~e is-n~t~)Pl~0S6d to res~hing. <br /> <br /> P,~cipal City Engineer 0~son noted~a dr/ye-over type curb is acceptable. He also indicated a <br /> rePert;'was received from(SRF recommending a sound wall not be put up due to the opening <br /> provii:led by 156th Lane anti'the sound traveling through that opening. He stated a sound wall is <br /> not recommended for wiIdlife Sanctuary 3~d Addition either. <br /> <br /> Motion by C&~ssi:0ner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Kociscak, to close the public <br /> hearing. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Johnson, Kociscak, and Brauer. <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Reeve, Sweet, and Watson. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/May 2, 2002 <br /> Page 16 of 23 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I, <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I' <br /> <br /> <br />