Laserfiche WebLink
-40- <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon stated Edina Development has applied for site plan review to <br />develop 110 townhomes on the property located west of Highway #47 and north of Alpine Drive <br />N.W. The property is approximately 24.11 acres in size. The property is currently completing <br />the process to be zoned R-3 Urban Residential, which allows for medium density residential <br />development at a density not to exceed 7 units per acre. The net density (subtracting Alpine <br />Drive and T.H. #47 road tight-of-ways and wetlands) is 6.8 units per acre.:~-;'::!iii~he proposed <br />town_homes consist of four and six unit structures. The Staff will work with de~f6~er to remove <br />the extra parking spaces if approved by the Planning Commission. Lot c 'ge is restticted to <br /> o and the coveraoe in the ro'ect is a roximately 13%. The stru-~0n private streets <br />35¼ ~ p J . PP <br />meet the 25 foot se~,back established in the new private street policy. <~.Th~eistructi~tr~;~Qn the put~l~c <br />street received a 10 variance to the 35 foot setback road tight-of~waY':l~e. <br /> <br />Commission Business <br />Chairperson Nixt noted the map on page 190 in the S,~ff;;2keview let~i:'~hows landscaping and <br /> <br />Terry, Herman, representative of the developer, responded~:~th~.?~aP does show landscape <br />screening, though now with the sound walt: ~eqffked, much of that'~iI;!!'he eliminated. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked if anything has been:mq~este~:¢i':I{~~ of the 10 ~f0at wall. <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon repl~ed the city'req~i~":i tree p~"unit, and anything more is <br />additional. ;::?::::~ ...... ::~::~.:~ <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt stat~J~Pariances hav'~ been given:i, for some of these lots to comply and he <br />encouraged the Ci~'t~'tgive some,C~;kderafior~to l~r~d~caping to ensure nothing is lost in regard <br />Pnnc~pal. Planne. r:;Trudgeon :noted' addmonal buffering will not work well since the sound wall <br />must <br /> <br /> Ch~¢erson Nixt clatifieci~:}he wa~i~'t concerned with landscaping near the sound wall, but <br /> p0s.~ly more should be added within the development. <br /> <br /> Motion~:~Ommission&:iJ6hnson, seconded by Commissioner Kociscak, to recommend that the <br /> City cound:~i~:i.'appro~-e;:th~ proposed site plan for Evergreen Point contingent upon compliance <br /> with City Staf:f~e~¢~w' Letter dated April 26, 2002, and subdivision approval. <br /> <br /> Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Johnson, Kociscak, and Braner. <br /> Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Reeve, Sweet, and Watson. <br /> <br />Case #15: Zoning Bulletin <br /> <br />Planning Commission/May 2, 2002 <br /> Page 22 of 23 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />t <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />t <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br />'1 <br /> <br />i! <br /> <br /> <br />