Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />,I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated that he had no problem with the extension. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Zimmerman, seconded by Councilmember Kurak, to adopt <br />Resolution #02-05- granting a one year extension to June 26, 2003 for the implementation <br />of the conditional use permit for a recycling facility issued to St. Paul Terminals in Resolution <br />#01-06~241 and a related extension to September 30, 2003 to complete the concrete screening <br />wall as described in said conditional use permit. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Zimmerman, Kurak, Anderson, <br />and Hendriksen. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #11: <br /> <br />Introduce Ordinance to Establish Regulations for the Operation of <br />Helicopters within the City Limits <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik stated this case was put together in response to recent <br />incidents relating to helicopter takeoffs and landings in residential neighborhood. Staff has <br />consulted with MnDOT Office of Aeronautics to gain some insight into this type of activity and <br />how it can be regulated. MnDOT issues three types of heliport licenses: 1) personal use, <br />restricted to use by one person; 2) private use, which is for use by multiple persons at the <br />invitation of the owner (example would be the heliport at a hospital); and 3) public use, which <br />is unrestricted and open to the public. Current legislation says that the MnDOT Office of <br />Aeronautics can no longer require licensing of personal use airfields unless they are within five <br />miles or' an airport. If they are outside the five mile radius, the applicant can request that the <br />personal use airfield be licensed by MnDOT Office of Aeronautics. One of MnDOT's <br />requirements for licensing personal or private use airfields is that the applicant conform to the <br />Federal Aviation Regulations requiring the owner to file a notice of intent to establish a landing <br />area with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). In response to the notice, the FAA does <br />an airspace evaluation and responds by either objecting or not objecting to that use of the <br />airspace. However, FAA is not a licensing agency and even if they determine that the use of the <br />airspace and landing area is unsafe, they cannot prohibit someone from utilizing that landing <br />area. But MnDOT, the licensing agency, can refuse a license application and typically doses if <br />there is a negative determination from the FAA. In addition, MnDOT's decision to issue a <br />license is based on the safety concerns and they do not take noise into consideration. If the City <br />wants noise to be a consideration, then the City would have to require its own permit and identify <br />noise as a factor to be considered. The City doesn't have the expertise on staff and would have <br />to seek outside assistance to properly review the application. City Code would also have to <br />define and establish acceptable noise levels. Based on the information staff received staff <br />recommended attempting to regulate helicopter activity only at this time. Staff recommended <br />that the Council introduce the proposed ordinance to require that heliports within the City limits <br />be licensed by MnDOT Office of Aeronautics. If the City Council was inclined to go a step <br />further and require a special permit from the City for heliports so that noise levels can be a part <br />of the consideration another ordinance was drafted for Council consideration. <br /> <br />City Council/May 14, 2002 <br />Page 27 of 33 <br /> <br />-83- <br /> <br /> <br />