Agenda - Council - 03/26/2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I Motion by Board Member Johnson, seconded by Board Member Sweet, to adopt Resolution #02- 03-072 adopting Findings of Fact #0604 relating to ACCAP's request for a variance to lot area. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Board Members Johnson, Sweet, Kociscak, and Reeve. Voting No: Board Member Watson. Absent: Board Member Brauer. W ' Motion by Board Member Johnson, seconded by Board Member S eet, t%apgrove ACCAP s request for a variance to the lot area requirements in the R-3 Urban Resid~~, '. ~istfict, based on the fin&ngs of fact, and adopt Resolutmn #02-02-073 declaring terms o~li~' ce. Motmn camed. Voting Yes: Chmrperson N~xt, Board Members~:JQ~son, Sweet,'~8:eiscak, and Voting No: Board Member Watson. Absent: Board Me~' Brauer. Reeve. Commumty Development D~rector Frohk requested &s~s~on t~e phce on the rev~se~'s~te plan. She noted some of ~e ch~ges ~e that each ~weway wall gp~%e 25 feet, ~e private street between the ~o center umts has been opened up to~:g~Ss od Drive, ~d ~e smgle- hmily units have been a~ached to the tow~ouse smc~'~?g~'explained mat ~ot was concerned that the no~herly emergency~,~>.~access w~ too close~,:tg~(i~,~. ~7 and suggested it be moved south 250 feet. ~e developer h~.;'mm'~k back ~ m it can be, ~d it 'doesn't quite meet the 250 foot requirement. ~e'~ ~~iS,worhn}5~:~ot. She said as a result of reviewing this site plan, Staff h~ d~ig~ned ae~ ph¢~i{:~ s~eet policy is a work Chaicerson Nixt suggest~ ~is::it~. be disc~'~d" as item ~1 in ~e Pla~ing Co~ission Case ~2: Request er a Va}:,;~ z~)~gm Slope Grades, Case of John Enstrom Chaicerson ~ixt closed~he:'r~lar potion of the Bo~d of Adjustment meeting at 7:15 p.m. in order t~ con~Tffie, pub li C'~g. CB~erson Nixt called ~:public he~g to order at 7:15 p.m. 'q ' '"':""': % / Presentation .... Ci~ Engfinee)<:J~0~}N stated JoM Ens~om has a ~ading pe~it to excavate soils ~d create a pond on'lis prope~. Ramsey Ci~ Code establishes a ma~mum slope ~ade of 12%. ~is standard was established with ~e creation of new neighborhoods in mind. It does not take into account creating ponds for wNch a steeper slope is o~en a natural transition to the waterline. ~. Enstron applied for a variance ~om the 12% maximum slope ~om the shoreline g~ades to his pond. %e variance was considered at the Febmaw 27, 2002 Board of Board of Adjustment/March 7, 2002 Page 3 of 5 -9-