Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />:1 <br /> I <br /> I <br />'1 <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> City of Ramsey <br />Recommendation Summary <br /> <br />Web <br /> <br />We recommend that Ramsey undertake the execution of a web strare~ aimed at providing <br />key information to residents of the City and proacfively delivering frequendy requested <br />public information generated by the City. <br /> <br />The City has already investigated subscribing to the GovDocs.com document management <br />and delivery service. We believe that in addidon to this, the City should implement a <br />relatively basic content-management driven site to allow updates to key information by the <br />owners of that information. These areas would include Fire, Police, City administration, and <br />others. <br /> <br />The City requested that the Web For Cites program be investigated. Although sponsored by <br />the League of Minnesota Cites, the Web For Cities program is largely supported and <br />financed via a private enterprise, Avenet. We have two primary concerns associated with the <br />Web for Cides pro,am. <br /> <br />The first is the possible business continuity risks Avenet w[ll suffer in the' current <br />environment, ~ven the fact that their business requires thousands of cities to sign up to <br />become cash flow positive. Based on our research of Avenet, we believe there is at best a <br />fifty percent probability of Avener rema/_nJ.ng in business through the first quarter of 2002. <br /> <br />The second concern is that the Web for Cities program is not particularly robust. Although <br />we do feel that the GovOffice solution from Avenet may offer a low-price, low-end offering <br />suitable for small municipalities (fewer than 5,000 residents), prkrmxily because of ks <br />extremely accessible price, we do not believe ir is suitable for a vibrant and expanding <br />community such as Ramsey, particularly in light of the fact that operations would likely cease <br />prior to any substantial upgrade to the systems. <br /> <br />We recommend the following prioririzafion of web content and transactional capabilities for <br />the City's web initiatives. These priorities were arrived at by focusing on delivering the <br />kighest-value content quickly, without immediately' placing an overwhelming burden across <br />the City's departments. <br /> <br />Phase I: Ci .t-y' Home Page and Core Content <br /> <br />Much of the Phase I content can be delivered via GovDocs, which will offer an added <br />benefit of allowing citizens to subscribe to updates. We recommend that items indicated <br />with an asterisk (::') be housed in GovDocs to provide access to these subscription services. <br /> <br />· City Code (*) <br />· City Emergency Plans (*) <br /> <br />-255- <br /> <br /> <br />