Agenda - Council - 03/12/2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I ,I Mr. Johnson responded he would like to discuss item #6 further. He said that the 32 units do not provide that much more traffic. He preferred one full service access point rather than two. He explained that if there must be two access points, he feels an access more centrally located on Sunwood is best. City Engineer Jankowsk/ replied there would not be a problem to change second access. of the Mr. Johnson suggested he work with the City Staff to guarantee a that emergency access and every day .traffic are two different is,' development only needs one access. He stated townhome Mr. Johnson asked if putting in a surmountable curb vehicle could be driven over the curb. e feasible since an City Engineer Jankowski explained that if the arise of who should maintain it. it, then the issue would. Chairperson Nixt clarified that the feel it is necessary. sed to the sc because he doesn't Mr. Johnson agreed and added that a dead through and it keeps the People cannot cruise Chairperson Nixt inq from them. noted the City's policy is to move away Community Develop: accesses this plat; this is is the main public street spine that it is an existing street. Commi§§iOner e~rg,ency vehmles ~e'..,'. ¢' C~f~i .un._._ity Developme disc~'~i3h';~n the lack of this seems like a win/win, to have one main access and restricted access. Frolik mentioned that Mr. Jankowski woUld like ffirther md the fact that garage aprons will abut the access road. City Engi concerned ab clarified that he was concerned from safety standpoint. He 'was up or pulling into a blind area. Mr. Johnson suggested that one of the things that could be considered is providing longer aprons on the garages. Planning Commission/February 7, 2002 Page 11 of 19 -20-