My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/12/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2002
>
Agenda - Council - 03/12/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 11:05:37 AM
Creation date
9/3/2003 3:22:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/12/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
261
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-36- <br /> <br />Scott Watkins, 6140 140t~' Lane N.W., stated it doesn't seem like good government to change to <br />medium or high density. As far as traffic, about 2,000 people are estimated to be in there with <br />570 in single family homes. He stated he is opposed to the change. <br /> <br />Julie Horn, 6031 145th Lane stated she would like single family homes to be built.' Housing units <br />or townhomes do nOt fit the neighborhood. Single family homes will be better for traffic and <br />safety. <br /> <br />Sandy Bertzyk, 6001 I46th Avenue NW, stated she received 95 <br />townhomes going in. She noted that people within 300 feet get <br />signatures on the petition, 51 had signed the petition. They signed <br />If she had more time, she stated she could have had more si <br />copies of the petitions that were received by the Mayor. <br /> <br />Ms. <br /> <br /> . against the' <br />she traced the <br /> she said. <br /> <br />A resident at 6121 145th Lane stated he would like to <br />area. He said he lived in Coon Rapids 5 years ago. <br />townhomes going in, but they did go in. As he goes <br />they moved out. <br /> <br /> den: single family <br />living fought the issue of <br /> he said he is glad <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt stated he agreed that on6e)i~:.tand is leaves too many issues <br /> <br />Motion by Chai~erson Nixt, seconded by'~Ca~o~er~:S~6t~ o keep the low densiW <br />residential desi~ation for th~,~roP¢~ i'i',N'~d South ~P Sunwood Drive. <br /> <br />Fu~her D~scusslon. ~34~ ~.~m y ~ea <br /> <br />Co~ssmner JoMson stated he..d6~a:k~2have,a prObl~em w~th ~s ~,d would expect ~at ~f.an <br />appropriate desl~ com,-m, lt~d~be-ch~ng~?}~,med~um dens~W.' ~e prope~ ~s gmng to b <br />developed. ~s it get d, we will b'~'~open to some densiW discussion that could <br /> <br />ME~P~ed. Vo i *:Syes: ,erson Nixt, Co~issioners Sweet, Brauer, Jonson, and <br />~Ca. Voting No: ~issio~:~'Reeve. Abstain: Co~issioner Watson. Absent: None. <br /> <br />Mot~on,~g: Chm~erson ~k[ seconded by Co~ssmner Brauer to approve the text amendments <br />to ae C~ehensive ~Z~s proposed. ' <br /> <br />Motion Ca~5~t~ng Yes: Chaieerson Nixt, Co~issioners Brauer, Jonson, Kocisc~, <br />Reeve, Sweet, and~--Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br /> <br />Case #11: Zoning Bulletin <br /> <br />Noted. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/February 7, 2002 <br /> Page 18 of 19 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />! <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.