My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 01/11/2011
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2011
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 01/11/2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 1:27:31 PM
Creation date
1/6/2011 3:46:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
01/11/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I Prepared by the Minne <br />0 <br />Ramsey 2030 <br />Land Use Plan <br />Proposed <br />MRCCA Districts <br />River <br />CA -3 <br />CA4 N <br />CA -6 <br />CA-6 <br />MRCCA Boundary <br />Dayton 2030 Land Use Plan <br />Damp Omen.. Low ib ,,, am,tim" 55.e6 use <br />La„ wn...n.me. +v� <br />e nv <br />uu <br />Y i <br />Onm <br />o <br />ota Deportment of Natural Resources, September8, 2010 <br />Ramsey (also in State Wild & Scenic River Program) <br />Ramsey 030 Plan — Mixed Use: "A mall area of the Critical Area et the City's west border is guided for Mixed Use. Mixed Use areas may include a <br />y d Use s y g y <br />combination of residential, commercial, light industrial, open space, and a transit hub. This designation will provide flexibility to develop in a manner that is <br />consistent with Critical Area regulations, while still achieve community objectives for investment along Highway 10. The portion of the Mixed Use district <br />within the Critical Area will he planned to support Critical Area policies for land use and development standards. Mixed Use development in this area will be <br />accommodated through density transfers and the PUD process to ensure that open space requirements are met and valuable natural areas are preserved." <br />Proposed MRCCA District CA - 2: In this district, the minimum lot size is 2 acres, but lot size and density may be increased through the PUD process. Use is <br />governed by underlying zoning. Notes City staff proposes that this area is changed from CA -2 to CA -3 ICA - defers to underlying lot size and density). <br />4 <br />Comparison of 2030 Comp Plans & <br />Proposed MRCCA Districts <br />Ramsey 2030 Plan — Low Density Residential: "Low Density Residential must have urban services before development can take place. These areas will <br />average 3 units /acre and contain single family, detached dwellings... Due to regulations placed on the area to achieve Critical Area Tier 1 and Tier 2 and Wild <br />& Scenic Objectives [minimum lot size of 2 acres], it is unlikely that a 3 unit /acre average density will be achieved in the Critical Area. However, given regional <br />growth strategy to encourage higher density within MUSA, the opportunity to create a plan with higher densities that is acceptable to the public, and meets <br />approval of local and state regulatory agencies should still be provided... It is the intent of this plan to encourage a development pattern that seeks to <br />minimize density within the Critical Area Corridor while maintaining the ability to achieve higher density development consistent with urban development <br />standards and policies. This intent can be achieved by transferring density from within the corridor to adjacent residential land use areas through the PUD <br />process and through creative zoning techniques." <br />Proposed MRCCA Districts — CA 2 /CA - 5: CA -2 applies to land adjacent and visible from the river. This district has a minimum lot size of 2 acres, but lot size <br />and density may be increased through the PUD process. CA -5 applies to land not adjacent or visible from the river, and defers to lot size and density in <br />underlying zoning. This "tiered district approach" allows density transfer away from the river to achieve urban densities. <br />Notes City staff proposes rhat all areas currently proposed as CA -2 are changed to CA -3 (CA -3 defers to underlying lot size and density). <br />© <br />Ramsey 2030 Plan — Commercial /Business Park: Small portions of land along Highway 10 are guided for future Commercial and Business Park Use. <br />Proposed MRCCA District — CA - 5: In this district, lot size, density, and use are governed by underlying zoning. <br />Notes City staff does not propose changes to this district. It is consistent with the City's 2030 Plan. <br />Dayton (also in State Wild & Scenic River Program) <br />Dayton 2030 Plan — Mixed Use: The Historic Village in the northwest corner of Dayton is guided as Mixed Use, which has a minimum density of 8 units /acre, <br />except in the Critical Area where density is limited to 2.2 units /acre. An undeveloped parcel southeast of the Historic Village is also guided as Mixed Use. <br />Proposed MRCCA District CA 4 /CA - 5: In both the CA -4 and CA -5 districts, lot size, density, and use are governed by underlying zoning. The CA -4 district was <br />created specifically for and applies only to existing historic downtowns in Dayton and Hastings. The CA -5 district applies to land not adjacent or visible from <br />the river. Notes City staff does not propose changes to these districts. They are consistent with the City's 2030 Plan. <br />© Dayton 2030 Plan — Low Density Residential (a Greenway Overlay): Lots adjacent the river in this area are guided as Low Density Residential, which has a <br />minimum density of 3 units /acre, except in the Critical Area where density is limited to 2.2 units /acre. Portions of this land are also subject to a Greenway <br />Overlay that provides additional protections for natural features such as floodplains, wetlands, woodlands, and bluffs. <br />Proposed MRCCA District — CA - 2: CA -2 applies to land adjacent and visible from the river, and has a minimum lot size of 2 acres. Setbacks from the OHWL <br />and bluffs are also greater in this district than in all other districts except CA -1. Notes City staff generally concurs with the CA -2 district designation from a <br />density standpoint; however, they propose that part or all of the area is changed to CA -3 because the OHWL and bluff setbacks in CA -2 make approximately <br />10 lots unbuildable. It should be noted that the proposed setbacks in the CA -2 district are consistent with the setbacks in Dayton's current zoning ordinance. <br />O Dayton 2030 Plan — Existing Unsewered Low Density Residential: This unsewered area is not included in Dayton's density calculation. Dayton's plan states <br />that the land use pattern makes future subdivision difficult, although limited subdivision may occur on larger parcels if sanitary sewer is provided. <br />Proposed MRCCA District CA 2 /CA - 5: CA -2 applies to land adjacent and visible from the river. This district has a minimum lot size of 2 acres, but lot size and <br />density may be increased through the PUD process. CA -5 applies to land not adjacent or visible from the river, and defers to lot size and density in underlying <br />zoning. This "tiered district approach" allows density transfer away from the river to achieve urban densities. <br />Notes City staff does not propose changes to these districts. They are consistent with the City's 2030 Plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.