My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 01/11/2011
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2011
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 01/11/2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 1:27:31 PM
Creation date
1/6/2011 3:46:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
01/11/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Rulemaking Update <br />City of Ramsey Supplemental Analysis <br />In 2009, the Minnesota Legislature directed the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to commence rulemaking to update <br />minimum standards in the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA). The MRCCA is a state designated geographic area along the <br />Mississippi River that encompasses communities along this corridor beginning with the cities of Ramsey and Dayton, stretching through <br />Hastings. The City of Ramsey currently conforms to the state requirement by having a section in our Comprehensive Plan and corresponding <br />ordinance that has been determined to be in substantial compliance with the existing state rules. <br />The following analysis supplements draft standards proposed by DNR staff. The analysis provides a side -by -side comparison of the City's existing <br />ordinance and proposed standards. There has been much concern on behalf of local units of government to be able to maintain local decision - <br />making as to land use controls. The intent of the rulemaking process is to update rules that were initially created in 1979, clarify standards, and <br />create consistency across the corridor. However, LGUs have expressed concerns moving from the current language stating `structure site and <br />location shall be regulated to ensure that riverbanks, bluffs, and scenic overlooks remains in their natural state, and to minimize interference <br />with views of and from the river, except for specific uses requiring river access' to a codified set of standards as proposed. Concern has been <br />raised regarding non- conforming lots and the development capability of undeveloped property. <br />It should be noted that the City has long had issues with the existing ordinance as it relates to land use designation. A large portion of the <br />MRCCA within the City is designated as 'rural open space', which the City feels is inconsistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, which guides <br />this area as Low Density Residential (LDR), a suburban -type density. In addition, the City has maintained displeasure with the MRCCA <br />overlapping with a second overlay district known as the Wild and Scenic Overlay. This overlap creates an administrative disadvantage and <br />extremely difficult to understand which standards apply (generally more restrictive of overlapping standard applies). The draft rules include <br />language to exclude the City from the Wild and Scenic Overlay by virtue of protection under the MRCCA. Many of the areas currently under <br />rural open space are proposed to be guided as CA -3 (suburban densities) and CA -5 (underlying zoning). This put the City at a slight advantage, <br />compared to other cities, by making existing lawful, non - conforming structures conforming. <br />Vegetative management has also been a concern of the City Council. Although existing rules prescribe some vegetative management (restrictive <br />removal), the proposed standards would codify these standards, again raising concerns of creating non - conforming uses. <br />In summary, all communities are required to have ordinances and plans in substantial compliance with the existing MRCCA plans. The City has <br />expressed concern with codifying these standards, as it feels it takes local control of land use decision making away from the LGU. Regardless of <br />the outcome of the rulemaking update, City Staff would ask that the following be corrected from the existing ordinance: <br />• Amend 'Rural Open Space' areas to 'Urban Developed' (CA -3 in the proposed classifications) <br />• Eliminate overlap with Wild and Scenic <br />• Amend open space requirement for new developments to match 'Urban Developed' (tied to first bullet) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.