Agenda - Council - 02/26/2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

to medium density. He stated that they need some clarification of what the property lines what the land uses are for each area. Principal Planner Trudgeon noted that the adopted Comprehensive Plan property as medium density. of the Commissioner Brauer stated tha~ if the property owner have not agreed he did not see how they could rezone the property, yet the property around them and landlock them with medium density Chairperson Nixt requested that they table the discussion on. future time. Councilmember Zimmerman stated that one problem required to make the application to rezone a [ should have the right to rezone their property and they not a developer. title owner is not :.property owners the rezoning, Councilmember Anderson replied that there are many changes without a request by the property owner. ,~?[~:., :~ ....... Chm~erson N~xt stated that :~y ne~q~d to sch~'e}~ j,~q[nt me~tm~:be~een ~e Pla~g Co~ission and Ci, Counci~{0 disc~'the l~d us~:~(~.:hut:'~am to focus on he public Julie Horn, 6031 14Y~'Lane ~, R~sey,'~'~at h~ conCern had to do w~th proposed l~d use mendmen~#!9:-'-~e!~¢ ~s being prop6~ to be used for low ad m d~um dens~, but the land su~ouna~'~he prop~.is all single f~ ~o~es. On July 14, 1999 a request w~ made to rezon~,.ffid'.:Prope~ for ~-~;otential purchas:~?by~pUlte Homes. At ~at time a petition mrculate&:.'~d ov~ 150 s~res were rec~&'opposmg ~e rezomng. ~e remdents m ~at ~ea p~chaseG.~eir hom~ ~e~on ~e h~;Be~g s~gle f~ly homes. ~e neighborhood is ex~emely agmm?hech~nge. 'S~e:st~:~a she d~d see ~ ~ea xdent~fie.d as a buff~ =ea , but ff a developer comes'~ fo~d w~ a Plied Umt Development ~e en~e s~te could be · v*.~?TJY'~' ... · ::~'i'~ .':~: .... , ,~:~¢%:~eI~ed medium a~. Ms. Horn also expressed concern wx~ ~e lmge number of medmm .g~m,r¢~p" dens~pr~s being presented .;beeuse of ~e ~pact ~e h~ dens~W will have on s~eets ~d schools. "C~.uncflmember K;~s a m~ber of ~e Council ~d residents me ve~ womed about ~ ~e conflict ~F~t~est w~h~'voting on ~e l=d ~e ch=ge Chai~erson N~t:;stated that they were ~ere to he~ co~ents on why or why not a land use should be ch~ad. ~e issue reg~ding a possible conflict of interest MI1 addressed at a ~,Hom~mplied that the residents have hked legal counsel regarding the issue. She stated that the prope~ is not close to any amenities, not close to highways and does not fit with the Planning Commission Joint MeetinWJanuary 24, 2002 Page 6 of 15 -239-