Agenda - Council - 02/26/2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Councilmember Hendriksen stated that it sounded like another situation where someone reauestint~ a land use chan,,e on ~ror~ertv they did not own. He stated that he did not;.z~'~7 ~. change being a result of a petition from a neighborhood, but would research that furthT~!?:: Chairperson Nixt stated that the issue would be discussed in more detail at a Lance Ragor, 6194 146th Avenue NW, Ramsey, stated that he lives on Dr/ye and 146t~ Avenue, directly across from Kurak property #10. to the change. Previously when a proposal for the land was. infbrmed as to what would happen with the land, but at th.is may not be the developer of the land and there are no plans~ drafted 'for and against the change two years ago and the change. of he is ~sidents know who may or There was petition of t~e residents were against · Ms. Horn noted that when the Planning Commission and they read the wording. She stated that there was no petition sig-ned by residents that did not want the higher circulated was about preservim ~pace, which of course 'they space. review the petitions petition, it was simply a other ~etition that was green Councilmember Kurak noted done under a Planned Unity'D'eVeloP~t.~ - '~ They property the developer was applying for '~P'lanned The property owners did not request the Chairperson Nixt"~e~'e~i~that focus ~.ounmlmember Hendriksem~ted that it was going to be for a rezoning of the which did not go forward. proposed land use changes at this time. to clearly understand that once a land use for very rare instances, changes!, rezOmng cannot g~nemlly be den/ed ~'- '. -' Chai~erson Nfit.rep ~. CiW approves ~e a~endment ~ey do have to ca~ ~ough withJ~"once Soy ~e a~aed to by ~e Met Council. Cound,~ember.; Hendn~mstate~ that:~,.,., he d,d no w~t ~yone to go away ~mg ~at ,f a l~d use chug'es: ~ey will still M~e~:an oppo~ to discuss ~e actual rezonin~. ".~,'w J .... 'V~: Tim ~alen,}:¢~l 145~'L~e ~, Ramsey, stated that he w~ concerned wi~ l~d use mendment ~l~f~:)He stated Sat he has lived in ~e nei~borhood for five ye~s ~d is opposed to the change. H~?exCressed concern with ~e numerous proposals from low to me&um dens~U ~at were being prbi~nted. He stated that the schools are ~ready overcrowded ~d a Ngher de~iU "::'¥~fll add mOZ¢.'cNldren. He was also told when he 'purch~ed Ns prope~ that ~e prope~ was ~6ih:g to, B~'-'~ingle family homes ~d requested that it stayed that way. Planning Commission Joint Meetin~January 24, 2{/02 Page 8 of 15 -241-