Agenda - Council - 02/26/2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I involved in a plan regarding the relocation of Highway #10. She expressed concern tb41~i~Y were movin~ to soon on man,/ of the issues until the questions pertaining to the higt~waT~ answered. Jhe questioned if ihey state in the Comprehensive Plan how much of::; :;~;t~'el'~nd:- in a mixed use development can be used for residential' and how much can be used :~p~ct3~ercial would that hold up in court, i-~i!~ii!~i~??' ::'~i~ ~~ ~" Chairperson Nixt replied that the concept would be that there,would be a '~O~Bg ~overlay di~:,. but would have to get a legaI opinion regarding Ms. Connolly s quest.~n~ "-~}}~i;;~. Ms. Connolly requested that a leaal opinion be ~ven at the next~ mee~tin~:'::'~,:: :5~ ' ' Mr. Menth inquired as to what was changing with the Preserve langUage. Chai,erson Nixt explained ~at lan~age was bein*:~d~::~r~ferenc~'~d:'~fpct ~at ~ey ~e a Councilmember Hendhksen stated that he had requested that l~i'~e;be included that ~e CiW would not require people to hook-up to CiW de,ices if it were exte~'a~.. ~0~'bf their home became he w~ted to the Met Counc~ ~o'~ea4 ~at fan,age ad a~ee td~:'Hf~ &ncem was ~at they will find out that ~e Met Coun~ :~U~a'~e Ci~ Charier. Cha~erson Nixt stated that tha'pu oa ;2f adding ¢::i e:p ining to the CiW Charier was to protect those people in ~e ~rai a~, ~om h~V~g to co~fiCt~to CiW sewer ~d water. ~. Men~ inquired k~it would protect the P~¢~e.~ the centrai~mral prese~e ~ea. Chai,erson ~};;liea'~'~2~ would apply t'~}~ homeowners equally in ~e Ci, of R~sey. ~. M~:~ted that he fe~at ~e pu, ose~ ~entral rural prese~e ~ea w~ to bring ~we~'~d ~?~}~a ~d. that byT~}~:50 ~ey will have to hook up. Chai, ersOn'Ni~}~iCf~[ned that ~e ~al mrgl prese~e ~ea lan~age has akeady been ~:¢,~77~Tk~:dpte& ~ pan of ~e2~Comprehensive Pl~, ~at additional [an~age reg~ding ~e CiW Cheer ~5?;r)~:~';:'5;~l'd~b~¢:~ded as ~'~fldm~L ~e l~guage ~at is included ~ ~e plan states that the will wor~"~.identi~ ~e '~otenffal for urban de,ices after 2020, it does not state ~at residents will be requital~ to co~e~ ~ 7":509 0 Councilmemb~:?:Hendfiksen stated that he objected to the way ~e discmsions were berg limited. ~e m~on ~e meeting w~ being held w~ to decide how ~ey w~t to change the ~ )}-f.~; Comprehensi~&;~lan and he did not feel that they should limit discussion to o~y those suggested '~;~:.Changes th~,7-[ave come ~om staff, Council or the Pla~g Co~ission. He felt that if ~ w~fed to present something that is not proposed he should be able to do so. ; -246- Planning Commission Joint Meetin~January 24, 2002 Page 13 of 15 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I