Laserfiche WebLink
-252- <br /> <br />Scott Watkins, 6140 140th Lane N.W., stated it doesn't seem like good government to change to <br />medium or high density. As far as traffic, about 2,000 people are estimated to be in there with <br />570 in single family homes.. He stated he is opposed to the change. <br /> <br />Julie Horn, 6031 145th Lane stated she would like single family homes to be built. Housing units <br />or townhomes do not fit the neighborhood. Single family homes will be better for traffic and <br />safety. <br /> <br />Sandy Bertzyk, 6001 146th Avenue NW,' stated she received 95 ~aCres against the <br />townhomes going in. She noted that people within 300 feet get noti~e~?;~she traced the <br />signatures on the petition, 51 had signed the petition. They signed .~{~'3i;truth~)(hand, she said. <br />If she had more time, she stated she could have had more si~a~i:6s. Ms. ~S~;.di~,tributed <br />copies of the petitions that were received by the Mayor. .~? <br /> <br />A resident at 6121 145~' Lane stated he would like to Ce~P~he densi~,!as single family i~i~s <br />area. He said he lived in Coon Rapids 5 years ago. ~,living th~}i:'-they fought the issue of <br />townhomes going in, but they did go in. As he goes bac~l~'f~.~h.at ne~b~)rhood, he said he is glad <br />they mo ved out. ' '¢~i':? <br /> Nixt stated he agreed that on~!~e ta~d is reclassl'l~:iit leaves too many issues <br />Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded bY;:}G0mmi.~¢~¢'~'S~t-~to' keep the low density <br />residential desigrtation for the Kumk?roperty II ~0~}.~d South of Sunwood Drive.. <br />Further Discussion: ., i~ ,4':37~''~ '~:%~;!~ <br /> <br />Commissioner Johns6n:.stated he~.~0~e~rr!~ ha~e a.~Pr6bt~m with th/s and would expect that if an <br />appropriate design c0-~e~:~in, it.~;~d~:'C~n~d:'t~i~i:nedium density. The property is going to be <br />developed. As it gets-;~dext'el°p'ad, we will be open to some density discussion that could <br />anticipate a :ii/g¢~densitY~'/it'~bme point. <br />MoS~fl~Carried. Vt~"~i~h~:¥es: Ch~erson Nixt, Commissioners Sweet, Brauer, Johnso_n, and <br />K~fi[~cak. Voting No: ¢¢fismissior~-d~'Reeve. Abstain: Commissioner Watson. Absent: None. <br /> <br /> Moti;r~d~y..i~hairperson N~ seconded by Commissioner Brauer to approve the text amendments <br /> to the ~ehensive ~t~-~s proposed. <br /> Motion Carri~':.~iVb~i'hg Yes: Chairperson Nixt, commissioners Brauer, Johnson, Kociscak, <br /> Reeve, Sweet, andt. Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br /> <br />Case #t 1: Zoning Bulletin <br /> <br />Noted. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/February 7, 2002 <br /> Page 18 of 19 <br /> <br /> <br />