Agenda - Council - 02/12/2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 10. The minutes, 34 seconds East 214.29 feet, thence South 32 degrees, 15 minutes, 34 seconds East 60 feet to the point of beginning. PARCEL 2: The Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of'Section 25, Township 32, Range 25, except that portion taken for CSAI-t ~5, Anoka County, Minnesota. PARCEL 3: The Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 26, Township 32, Range 25, Anoka County, Minnesota. That the total area of the propen'y to be rezoned is 86.71 acres in size. That the proposed rezoning is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) boundary. That the Subject Property is currently zoned B-1 Business and R-1 Single Family Residential and the surrounding adjacent properties are zoned R-1 Single Family Residential} with the exception of a parcel north of the development property that is zoned R-3 Urban Residential and a portion of the Flintwood Hills P.U.D. that is adjacent to the southwest portion of the development property. The Lord of Life property lying on the northeast side of Nowthen Blvd. is zoned B-1 Business and the Savannah Oaks Senior Apartment Building on the eastern side of Dysprosium St. is zoned NI2~ Multiple Residential. That the Applicant is proposing to construct 261 housing units, consisting of 88 single-family lots, 91 townhome units, and 82 apartment units. That the applicant is proposing a development that is consistent with the 2001 Comprehensive Plan designation of this property to have High Density Residentj.'al along Dysprosium St., Medium Density Residential along Nowthen Blvd. and Low Density Residential on the western part of the property. That the proposal be will be consistent with all other applicable City and State regulations. That the proposal will not be detrimental on surrounding market values. That the proposal will be a benefit to the Community as a whole. That the proposal will not impose undue burden upon public services and facilities. That the proposed will not be detrimental to future land uses in the surrounding area. motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: RESOLUTION #02-02- Page 2 of 3 -131-