My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/12/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2002
>
Agenda - Council - 02/12/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 11:04:08 AM
Creation date
9/3/2003 3:47:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/12/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
433
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-158- <br /> <br />they could leave as many trees as possible and require a buffer zone between the development and <br />the wetlands. <br /> <br />Jim Norman, 144.51 Potassium Street, Ramsey', stated that he lives across from the peninsula and <br />run the trails everyday. He. stated that he [s in support of the proposed development and felt that <br />they have done a good job at putting together a quality development. <br /> <br />Hillary Gonsior, 5741 145~ Court, Ramsey, expressed concern over the lack of the green space <br />along the peninsula. She stated that currently they see a wooded area with wildlife and if they <br />remove the trees they will see the dump. She explained that they moved into Ramsey because of <br />the surroundings in the areas and they were told that they could not build ~n the site across form <br />their property. She inquired if there would be a size limit placed on the house and if not she <br />would recommend splitting the [or. She also. inquired if the City will be requiring that <br />homeowners put in a lawn, because there are current residents that have lived in the City for three <br />years and have done nothing with their yards. She also did. not agree that the deyelopment will <br />have minimal traffic impact on the area. <br /> <br />Robert Sjoberg, 5731 !.45~ Court, Ramsey, stated that he had met with Mfr. Black and <br />appreciated the time he spent addressing the neighbors concerns. He stated that he liked the <br />overall concept of the development, including the senior housing. From the townhome standpoint <br />he felt that Shade Tree Construction was a good developer. He explained that his concern with <br />the development has to do with an area that should not be touched. He stated that every study <br />that had been done regarding the development has been paid for by the developer. Nothing has <br />been done on an independent basis. Mr. Sjoberg stated that he would like to see a more <br />independent study done on traffic as well as with the soil borings. He is opposed to dropping <br />homes into a wetland area. Across from his house three lots are proposed and he does not think <br />that the lots are large enough to accommodate a decent size house. He requested that an <br />independent environmental study be done of the area. <br /> <br />Jim Gilbertson, stated that everything used to be rural and now everybody is moving out and <br />everyone has to fight about everything. He questioned where the City was going. <br /> <br />Dan Schafer, 5809 1.42"a Avenue, Ramsey, stated that his concern has to do with the peninsula. <br />He stated that he did not think it would be possible to save the trees as part of the development. <br />There is not a lot of green space being proposed along the walking trails. He a/so inquired as to <br />how much run-off is going to be lost into the pond because of the drainage ponds that will be <br />constructed. He expressed concern that the water level will drop in the ex:i;sting wetlands. The <br />other main concern he had with the development was the increase in traffic. He stated that there <br />is already a lot of traffic along Dysprosium because it is the fastest route to H_ighway #10. <br /> <br />A resident suggested that the number of lots on the peninsula be reduced to four and that the <br />wetland lots should be a minimum of~A acre in size and be custom built lots with a minimum value <br />requirement on those lots. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/June 5, 2001 <br /> Page 13 of 28 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br />I <br />I' <br />I, <br />I <br /> I <br /> i <br />I' <br /> I <br />I <br /> I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.