My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/12/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2002
>
Agenda - Council - 02/12/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 11:04:08 AM
Creation date
9/3/2003 3:47:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/12/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
433
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-162- <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt inquired if the developer was far enough along with the grading analysis to <br />know for sure that they can emend City services without substantially changing topography along <br />the peninsula. <br /> <br />Nh-. Black repIied yes. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt requested that staff draft a document guarantying tree preservation as part of <br />the PUD. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sweet stated that she understands that an impact statement is not required, but was <br />not sure as to why an environmental assessment is not required. <br /> <br /> Principal Planner Tmdgeon stated that an environmental assessment on a residential subdivisions <br /> to be completed in the metro area is required if there is more than 250 single family hames or 275 <br /> multi family homes. If it is a mixed use development, they have to meet a scare of 1 or less and <br /> this de'veiopment rates at a .9 [, so it is not required. But the residents could petition that one be <br />'completed. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Chairperson Nix-t, to recommend that City <br />Council approve the preliminary plat subject to the City staff review letter dated June 1, 2001 and <br />contingent upon control over tree preservation, dealing with drainage and neighboring properties, <br />exploring the environmental issue, ongoing dialog with property owners and staff' across from the <br />"dog house" lot, and an approved PUD rezoning. <br /> <br />Motion Carded. Voting Yes: Chairperson Ni,-ct, Commissioners Johnson, Kociscak, Reeve, <br />Sweet, and Watson. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #8: <br /> <br />Request to Rezone Property from B-1 Business and R-1 Single Family <br />Residential to Planned lo'nit Development; Case of Royal Oaks Realty, Inc. <br /> <br />Chairperson Km't closed the regular portion of the Planning Commission meeting at 10:26 p.m. in <br />order to' call the public hearing tO order. <br /> <br />Public l~earing <br /> <br />Chairperson Ni~ called the punic hearing to order at 10:26 p.m. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Principal Planner Tmdgeon stated that Royal Oaks Realty has submitted an application to rezone <br />property located at the southwest comer of CSAH 5 (;Nowthen Blvd.) and Dysprosium Street <br />from B-1 Business and R-1 Single Family Residential to Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.). <br />The rezoning would allow the property to be subdivided for 73 single-family lots, 152 tow~ome <br />units and 82 apartment units. The property is 86.71. acres in size and is within the Metropolitan <br />Urban Service Area (MUSA). The preliminary prat accompanying the application proposes to <br /> <br />Planning Commission/June 5, 2001 <br /> Page 17 of 28 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.