Agenda - Council - 02/12/2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Mr. Black stated that what must be kept in mind is ~ .......... ~...,property is by the Comp Plan. The perfinsula lots are large.. He said they are tWin~>~ze pen/nsula and leave as many. trees as possible:. He .felt they have to follow all the guidelines. be taken because they are ri~t along the path. She asked the City to hold the con~m accountable to those words and to keep the g-reenery similar to what it is now. Commissioner Johnson said he was interested in the Staff's and possibly response to the handout fi.om Bruce Iverson. Principal planner Trudgeon commented that all the existing lots edge of the wetland except for those on the peninsula. He' noted lots to end short of the wetland, which will provide more ~een that go to the edge of the wetland, there is no control what owners move in. go shrunk On the lots the individual/ Mr. Black commented that this development will definitely l~ipe and have substantial ~admg. He rmterated tM~:i~3~l work w~th Staff to iR~s. H~s company believes strongly that when thex,~!9,~' ~they should ..... ~"lot so there is no problem with building on thatJ:°~i%~ilI m~"~: ~:~rainage wg~'properly. In order to do &at, they may have to take'"~t =ee~e stated :::~t 2-inch =ecs and N ~e, ~e neighborhood will ~e on ch~act~'.~ addenda{ resid 11 pl~t ~e~ o~ =ecs and Principal Pl~ei'T~g~:'pointed out ~a~;~5~n page 46 of ~e agenda, ~e devetop~ outlined what they w~ do for ~ee r.~e~anon. %;~ .... .:, M~ke Eagets, 5751 t4~ g0~ stated Ns pr~ ~s a~oss ~om Block 1, Lot _. He ~ere'N:'a van~ce to p?ffi~.home m ~ere::7~e noted ~at mffic on Iodine S~eet w~ dmc~sed before. He sag3~= g6~g '~p"th:ats~ ~5~d-a~emoon ~s going into ~e sun. He =ked if will be a stop m~'/omCoun~ Road 5 ~d Iodine. at ~e pomt~5, access. He ~p~ned ~e ~ffic w~H need to ~eld to Coun~ Road 5 ~om Iodine. He also notea:~ere is a s~gtion be~een Lord of Life's access ~d ~s access. Jim Bimer, 14~I Neon, expressed Ns concern ~at ~e developer is ~willNg to monize ~e ~ee lots m ~i:way ~. Iverson Ired out. He smd ~o&er concern m ~at ~e =ee pl~ doesnt %,¢:~,.,seem to fit ~t~N~e comp plan. ~ere ~s no ahment on how ~s ~s executed comp~ed to ~e %Ci~'s pl~..(.}[f~e developer will not look at how ~e a~ber oflots c~ be de~e~ed by ~ee to ~[e.:~:io4et~' ali~ wi~ what the Ci, ha laid ou~ he is concerned. 'He said he would feel more co~able if there wa a deeper und~st~dNg of the defiNfion and ~e accountabili~. He s~gested ta~ng a step back to review ~s. Planning Commission/January 3, 2002 Page 10 of 18 -213-