My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/22/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2002
>
Agenda - Council - 01/22/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 11:02:45 AM
Creation date
9/4/2003 8:58:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/22/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
316
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />INTRODUCE PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO AMEND REGULATIONS <br />RELATING TO THE KEEPING OF ANIMALS: <br /> By: Community Development DirectOr Sylvia Frolik <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />As you know, City Staff has been working with the Horse Care Board for the past year to review <br />and update the City's regulations for keeping farm animals and horses. The current farm animal <br />ordinance states that a property owner may have two goats, pigs or cows in any combination, as <br />long as they have 3-20 acres of land and a conditional use permit from the City. Beyond 20 <br />acres, there are no limits on the kinds and numbers of animals they may have (as long as it <br />doesn't become a nuisance). Currently, there are no regulations regarding the keeping of exotic <br />animals such as ostriches. <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />Last summer, the Horse Care Board recommended that the farm animal ordinance redefine the <br />list of farm animals to include cows, mules, donkeys, burros, ponies, goats, pigs, sheep, lamb, <br />turkey, geese, chickens and ducks. Each type of animal was assigned a number of animal units <br />based on production of waste. Then an appropriate number of animal units was prescribed for <br />various size parcels ranging from 3 to 20+ acres. The number of animal units allowed on a <br />parcel would be decreased by 1 unit for each horse being maintained on the subject property <br />when there is a mix of farm animals and equines. Language was also added to require a <br />conditional use permit for the maintenance of exotic animals on a parcel. <br /> <br />Secondly, it was recommended that the horse ordinance be clarified to reflect that when only <br />equines are being maintained on a property, the number of animals allowed is based on parcel <br />size only and not based on units of waste production as in the farm animal ordinance. The <br />proposed ordinance amends the parcel size requirements for maintaining horses. Currently the <br />horse ordinance states that a property owner may have 2 horses on 3 acres, and one additional <br />horse for each 1/2 acre over 3. The ordinance amendment would require one full acre over 3 for <br />each additional horse. Language was also added to allow for the lease of contiguous property for <br />increasing the number of permitted horses on a parcel when the horse owner has title to at least 3 <br />acres. <br /> <br />Thirdly, Chapter 5 has a Barns and Stables section that requires barns to be at least 50 feet from <br />any place of human habitation. The R-1 Rural Residential. Section in Chapter 9 requires barns to <br />be at least 75 feet from any property line. The ordinance amendments would transfer the 75 foot <br />property line setback from Chapter 9 to Chapter 5, in the same section as the 50 foot setback <br />from dwelling requirement. <br /> <br />On June 12, the City Council referred the proposed ordinances back to the Horse Care Board for <br />further consideration. The Council expressed concern with eliminating the reference to 'enclosed <br /> <br />-235- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.