Agenda - Council - 01/22/2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-38- Commission Business Vice Chair Kociscak called the regular meeting of the Planning Commission back to order at 8:46 p.m. Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Reeve, to recommend that the City Council adopt the Findings of Fact favorable to the applicant relating to a r~est to rezone the subject property from R-IR Residential, B-1 Business, and B-2 Businessii:~i','~3U Multiple Residential. .,~;~i~:?? Further Discussion: Commissioner Johnson noted that some of the cO~ ;¢~;~':4esigns of the development are well taken and the developer should do some .~o~;n the sk~t~lan.'~+' It is consistent with the Comp Plan, however. ~i?' Motion Carded. Voting Yes: Vice Chair Kociscak, C0~S~ioners Jo,.son, Reeve, Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: Chairperson Ni~:~:}~rid.~ommissid~':Brauer. · Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commis;~e~:~'~;qe, to recommend that City Council approve the request to rezone the subject property fro~ :P~!.R Residential, B-1 Business, and B-2 Business to R-3U Multiple Residefltihj:based on the findi~?.of facts. Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Vice Chair K~:S~cak, ~3~:~ioners Jc~:~on, Reeve, Sweet, and Watson. Voting No' None. Absent: Chairp4~B Nixt}:~':~:~Sioner Brauer. Case #7: Request RevieW¢C~Se of Ed~a Development Principal Pla~er explain~2dina Deve~bment has applied for sketch plan review of a tow~ome devel6~nt that wg[' ~:~::[~,~0~ouse u~ts. ~s is not a detailed plan at t~s point. The prop~':~S cu~5'0h~B~i~g~iness, B-2 Business and R-1 Single Family. ~e applic~t is ashng; ~*~he prope~ tJ*~-3U Multi-F~ily Residential. If the prope~ were tobe;:~¢a,to, R-3O~f~g:'~ropeny could be developed'-at' a dens/, not to exceed 7 u~ts an acre..~3 3~3'~[~apProX~e}y 24.11 acres in size. ~e sketch plan shows a net density (s~e~fing the road 3i~-0f-wap~d wetlands) of 7 units per acre. The proposed tow~omes e~ik't of four ~d six UiffStmcmr~'g¢: Additional detailed infomation will need to be submitted at"~..~e of site plan and~brelimina, plat review to dete~ine if the proposed tow~ome lots meet*'C~xequirements. :'~;e sketch plan is proposing private streets t~ough the development that wilF:C~ect to &iplab'Drive. The proposed private street aliment is not acceptable ~d should be ~ad ace~d~fig to the City En~neers co~ents in the CiW Staff review le~er dated December 283:~00:[};:~'A detailed drainage ~d gading plan will be addressed during ~e preliminau plat process. ~e project is subject to the review and pe~i~ing process of ~e Lower Rum River Watershed M~agement Organization (~0). ~e development will be requked to obtain a pe~it ~om ~ot showing the post and pre development calculations. The Pla~ing Co~ission should review the proposed sketch plan and provide direction to the Planning Commission/January 3, 2002 Page 16 of 18