My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/22/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2002
>
Agenda - Council - 01/22/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 11:02:45 AM
Creation date
9/4/2003 8:58:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/22/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
316
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
planned within a justified time frame. It was further noted that initial project design of public <br />infrastructure projects identified within this plan often begins two years or more prior to the date <br />of construction. The CIP is not intended to provide for precise budgeting. Capital costs are <br />projected as estimates· Upon each update of the plan, deletions, additions, delays, or other <br />revisions may occur, reflecting changing community needs. These changes allow for budget <br />refinements as a particular project nears actual construction. The plan does not contain a specific <br />designation, which denotes project priorities. There is no weighting or matching of priorities <br />between infrastructure types (streets, parks, utilities, building facilities) as each type of project <br />generally has a funding source unique to the project type and from which funds cannot be <br />reallocated. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen noted that the Committee had significant informal discussions prior <br />to the opening of the meeting.,~,~.~ <br /> <br />Councflmember Z~an felt '~t they should have further d~scuss~on on the new projects <br />prior to approwng ~plan. He st~ed that they need to determine how much money will be <br />needed for the projecfs:and how m~c~n th~ have to spend. <br /> <br />Councflmember Hendnksen agre~i~,. <br /> <br />Councflmember Anderson stated that ~h~;:;~o/ild be wflhng to go ahead as long as it does not <br />authorize any spending on any projec~:? <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendnksen stated thal ;hi:~lt:i::tha?fl~'~y should be voting on a CIP that they can <br />agree w~th, not just have a plan when there are~§eri~us ~ssueS ~th the plan s~mply because it can <br />be changed later. He felt that there were to estions to proceed. <br /> <br />Motion by Mayor Gamec, seconded by <br />Council adopt the City of Ramsey's Capital Improvement?ro, <br />noting that it is a forecasting tool and not an actual, committed <br />project will be reviewed when proposed. <br /> <br />recommend that the City <br /> the years of 2002-2006, <br /> expenditures and all <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, <br />No: Councilmember Hendriksen and Zimmerman. <br /> <br />Anderson, and Kurak. Voting <br /> <br />COMMITTEE INPUT <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br />Motion by Mayor Gamec, seconded by Councilmember Hendriksen, to adjourn the meeting. <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />Finance Committee/December 18, 2001 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />-49- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.