Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br />I <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if it was the City Attorney's statement is that those 13 <br />amendments had not been incorporated into a draft of the Comprehensive Plan that will be <br />subject to the public hearing. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that the 13 amendments have been drafted for the public hearing, <br />but can be changed after the public heating. Nothing is concrete pertaining to the 13 <br />amendments other than being identified for the public heating. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if they are holding a public hearing for each of those <br />changes and they are not included in the Comprehensive Plan, won't it be necessary to conduct <br />another public hearing in the future. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich <br />and then vote on them. <br /> <br />the purpose of the public hearing is discuss each amendment <br /> <br />Councilmember <br />incorporate those <br />LeFevere is false. If the vote <br />that is only what they are <br /> <br />meaning of the vote on December 11, 2001 was to <br /> Comprehensive Plan then the opinion by Mr. <br /> 2001 was too only to hold a public hearing and <br /> with the opinion. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich noted that <br /> <br />being held pursuant to State Statute. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated a public hearing on a Comprehensive <br />Plan amendment and the vote taken on 200l~,~aas to include .the Kurak property in <br /> ng. . ' i~' ~i~ ' <br />~hr;tpear~ye~ndcr~d inM/theH~ondm;kr~;nSs~eedpltha~a s~Vg~ctaa-tn~da~hvaatntha~;1. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that he did not say that wl/6n the C}~:~publishes a land use map <br />and schedules a public hearing the land use is adopted. The vote clude the amendment <br />at the public hearing and consider the amendments. The amEB~nts ~, be changed after the <br />public hearing. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman inquired as to what vote of the Council 'is required to pass a <br />Comprehensive Plan amendment. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied a.3/5ths vote. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated that he thought rezoning took a 4/5ths vote. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich explained that State Statute permits 3/5ths for rezoning unless changing <br />industrial to commercial. <br /> <br />City Council/January 8, 2002 <br /> Page 21 of 27 <br /> <br />-71- <br /> <br /> <br />