Laserfiche WebLink
'1 <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />any credit application received at City Hall before a certain date would allow for retr( <br />the beginning of the charge. Staff recommended that any correspondence <br />February 28, 2001, regarding requests for credits that are currently available entitles <br />owner retroactivity. This is, of course, contingent upon successful <br />application. This will give the City an opportunity to write an article in <br />issue of the Ramsey Resident and process the requests before the next <br />Gruber from Diamonds Sports Bar had mentioned that there were other <br />credits up to 80%. Through past experience, staff knows this to be <br />the reason there is an opportunity for larger credits available to <br />land use structure that is used so often in the implementation <br />property has distinguishing characteristics that sets itself <br />City. When determining what a particular land use !ay per <br />that are made regarding percent impervious that <br />example, the commercial/industrial land use <br />therefore gets a Residential Equivalence Factor around <br />impervious percentage of 20% which is equivalent to a KEF <br />Diamond's been in a City that used land use instead he would <br /> <br />fee of $2,096.64 instead of $763.06 <br />credits available would have given <br />quarterly charge of $377.40. His <br />credit criteria for the <br />credit). City <br />resolution. As stated in the previous <br />that can be reasonably be expected to <br />depending upon information <br />information the <br />to take on <br />the <br /> <br />is 64 percent higher. <br /> ~ercent credit from $2. <br /> e City o <br /> <br />is provided <br />time it <br /> <br />be no <br /> <br />credit <br /> <br />receive a <br />necessary to just <br /> If' <br /> someone <br />sometirr <br /> <br /> they do <br /> stems <br /> utilities. Every <br />every property in the <br /> there are <br /> 7's utility. For <br /> impervious and <br /> ports Bar has an <br /> Ramsey's system. Had <br /> out a quarterly <br /> the ponding <br /> him with a <br /> .53 (without the <br /> e to the modified <br /> in the existing <br />)vember 14, 2000, the cost <br /> <br /> credit~ be $200, $600, or $1,200 <br /> that i: for the credit has. Tkis <br /> the City would hire if the decision was made <br /> calculating This is also under the assumption that <br /> There is correlation to the amount-that would be <br /> complete Staff believes that although the existing <br /> defines the criteria that enables a 'property to <br /> ~ect the property owner to supply the information <br />ustment. In manner, all of the property owners in the 'City are <br /> of assigning credits comes to the City of R/amsey, there is a <br /> ~'. Th/s could also set the City up to be accountable for <br /> prior developments. <br /> <br />£ <br />expressed by <br /> <br /> ~nquired if the changes seem to satisfy the concerns that have been <br />,usiness community. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> lson replied that it does to a point. He stated that one of the largest concerns he <br /> business community was that in order to apply for a credit they had to pay <br />s'~'~~{~}'~do the calculations and the application was quite complicated. To address that <br />c°~'~'~taff._,,,.~,~s~, is proposing a pre-apphcat~on'. ' form. At the November 21, 2000 Public Works <br />t,26~mmittee meeting, there was discussion of malting a pre-application for the credits available for <br /> <br />City Council/December 19, 2000 <br /> Page 7 of 19 <br /> <br />-95- <br /> <br /> <br />