Laserfiche WebLink
when considering possible amendments to the animal ordinance. Staff also provided the,,,Board <br />with animal ordinances from Elk River, Blaine, Coon Rapids, Minnetonka, St. <br />Dayton, and Bethel, as well as information from the Minnesota Pollution Control Ag~n~fiPCA).'%4:~' <br /> <br />Board Member Roy Shumway stated that in order to solve the problems o.~?rm arffmals he <br />suggested using the suggestions of the PCA. .~:~?' <br /> <br />Board Member Scottston inquired as to what the population of afi~:e~s, ~n <br />animals that live on a property, that could become a nuisance. <br /> <br />Community Development Assistant Wald replied that there <br />receives a significant amount of complaint calls. <br /> <br />summer where she <br /> <br />Board Member Shumway stated that animals not <br />should be addressed by the Police. The noise <br />addressed. <br /> <br /> laws and that <br />~ssue that needs to be <br /> <br />The Board discussed at length how to~.dress noise concerns <br />was discussed that there should be axmmmum of three acres for any <br />should be a maximum animal )f parcels. <br /> <br />and foul. It <br />and that there <br /> <br />Community Development <br />that requirement. <br /> <br />inquired <br /> <br />would be included in <br /> <br />Board Member yes. <br /> <br />Board y <br />should .z:~,~a conditional <br /> <br />stated that <br />permit. <br /> <br />are extremely dangerous animals and <br /> <br />animals. <br /> <br />uire a ~mum of three acres to house any traditional farm <br /> <br />reviewer <br />5e <br /> <br />animal units as recommended by the PCA and discussed how many <br /> <br />Board <br />acres, and <br />restrictions. <br /> <br /> ested three animal units on five acres, five animal units on 10 <br />on 20 acres. For anything above 20 acres, there would be no <br /> <br /> ! <br />L! <br /> <br />Horse Care Board/November 20, 2000 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />-35- <br /> <br /> <br />