Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Zimmerman stated that he is not in favor of a low cost housing develo men~?m <br />the proposed location because a lot of residents in the area are opposed to the develo <br />for that reason he cannot support it. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman noted that th~~. only issue in front of the Council <br /> <br />Councilmembei' Zimmerman replied that if ACCAP purchases the prop ey <br />with a development proposal. ~ <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that in the purchase ' <br />it stated that if the City and ACCAP has not executed a <br />the agreement would terminate. <br /> <br /> land. <br /> <br />will <br /> <br /> in February <br />agreement by July 1, 2000 <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman noted that the City <br /> <br />adline. <br /> <br />Councilmember I-Iendriksen inquired as to what the legal imt <br />Proceed with the sale of the property. <br /> <br />are if the City does not <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich explained <br />party can terminate the a <br />Council wishes to terminate <br /> <br /> that either <br /> notice. So if the <br />the buyer.. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec suggested having the Ci <br />made with ACCAP and then bring the <br /> <br />agreements that have been <br /> <br />City <br />sell the land to sell the <br /> <br />needs to determine whether or not they want to <br /> needs to advise the Council on how to <br /> closing. <br /> <br /> the <br />I J I d <br /> Mr..~ohnson exp ~'*~;-;.,'.' their 2.5 n dol ars in fun ing commitments w~ll' be gone ffthey' <br />~ ~~,h, le to purchasable property in 2000. <br />I . <br /> · 5}¢~,quncdmeml~(,~.~.,,~erson, seconded by Mayor Gamec, to execute development <br /> ~ "*~;~ .~r~' . . . <br />~' agreement ~,.~, the ~ County Commumty Act, on Program, Inc. cont, ngent upon <br />~ ~ introductmn an.~i',~nal adoption of the City of Ramsey's required sale of land ordinance. <br /> <br />· r discussi~: Councilmember Anderson inquired that ifACCAP were to purchase the land <br />I <br /> ~ . . . <br />~ '~}~would the 2.~illion in funding be t~ed to that part, cular property or could ACCAP make a land <br /> '~¢.;~, , ~,~.~ . . . <br /> ~a, de or selvage property for another parcel m the C~ty. She stated that there are people m <br /> 1~ ~ /~I need th~s <br />I .... i"'~i~ i~'~ · ' type of housing and she does not li to see 2.5 million dollars being lost. <br /> Mr,~ohnson rephed that the funds are land specffic, but they would be m a better negot~at,ng <br /> p6~i~t~On if the City were to proceed with the sale of the land. He stated that ACCAP has a <br /> <br />City Council/December 12, 2000 <br /> Page 9 of 25 <br /> <br />-71- <br /> <br /> <br />