My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/09/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 01/09/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:17:58 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 10:20:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/09/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
464
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
! <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />roads. Councilmember Hendriksen stated that it would it make more sense to discuss thc <br />with the Planning Commission. Mr. McClown replied that they did meet with <br />Commission and wanted the Council to understand what their concerns are. He <br />are no dead end signs along their streets and real estate experts have <br />expect a depreciation of $10,000 to $12,000 on their property values. Noise. <br />are a quality of life issue. The residents were told that there would probabl <br />built on that site and with a gas station it will draw a lot more <br />Zimmerman replied that they need to provide for some business opp~ <br />property has been zoned commercial for many years. Mr. <br />object to the gas because there are already enough gas <br />Xkimo Court, Ramsey, stated that the property owner <br />44 feet wide, but by his calculations the road is <br />complaint is that the underground gas tanks will be lc 100 feet <br />is not acceptable to him. He suggested that they <br />//47. <br /> <br />there <br /> can <br /> <br /> Councilm <br /> area and <br /> the residents' <br /> Cofield, 5080 <br />~s an MSA road and is <br /> stated that his lar <br /> .s property and that <br /> .R. #22 and T.H. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmemb <br />Connolly, and Anderson. Votin No: <br /> <br />Hendriksen, <br /> <br />Case 6: Request for Final ~oliday Acres; Ca <br /> Enterprises am y <br /> <br />Community Development Director FroI <br />Victor Sacco of Lyndale Terminal <br /> <br />B, C and G <br />of T.H. #47 <br />proposed <br />5.40 <br /> <br />two a~ess <br />rights along <br />facilities. The <br /> existing <br /> wit <br /> tas been <br /> <br /> Addition <br /> The <br /> into~p lots. Lot 1 <br /> proposed p~[cel meets the <br />foot depth <br /> <br /> f Phoenix Enterprises and <br /> approval to replat Outlot A, <br /> ts generally located on the corner <br /> consists of approximately. 6.80 acres and is <br /> 1.40 acres and Lot 2 will be <br /> lot size requirement, the 100 foot <br /> Business District. The site will derive' <br /> plat-needs to be. modified to dedicate access <br /> will be serviced by municipal sewer and water <br /> e and utility easements are Provided along the perimeters of both <br />.sewer and water easement on Lot 2 will also be retained. As a result of <br /> ,River's Bend Park and the Rum River Bridge Corridor, this <br /> any park dedication. <br /> <br />Councilmem[ <br />access to the <br /> <br />inquired if the property owner would agree to dedicate the right of <br />on the Holiday site. <br /> <br />of <br /> <br /> Evan Street, Elk River, replied that they would be willing to dedicate the <br />the Holiday property. <br /> <br /> Development Director Frolik noted that the right of access will technically be <br />emcatea to the state. <br /> <br />City Council/December 12, 2000 <br /> Page 15 of 25 <br /> <br />-77- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.