Agenda - Council - 01/23/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-124- Presentation "' lVlr. Trudgeon stated that Noah Forlq Inc. has applied for prdim~/ plat appr~¥ai of St. ,~drews Addition. ~e plat consists of 44 lots r~aina in size from 1 to 3.5 acreS]~ ~ but 6 of the lots meetin~ the 160 foot mi~mum lot wid~ requirement for the No~fork ~.U.D'~?at ~e 40 foot buildin~ setback. Four of those 6 lots can be easily r~confi~redT[~8':;meet requirement but Lots t l and 12 of Block 2 are w~ na~ow. A couple bfbpfions are to ~ak~ Lots 11 ~d 12 one lot or require a buitdin~ setback at a point where:~e lo~,:~e .160 feet ~e proposed street names deviate from the ~d pa~em but have, been approved in past for De~s Peck - Director Of Development Zr No~hf0r~2t~ated ~at he h~ ~x.qew'ed the Staff Keview Le~er and a~ees that most of ~e lots can be reconfizUred to meet ~e 160 foot width requirement at ~e stand~d burring setback line. On Lots 1'1 ~d,~ will back up to ~e lake so there is a li~t as to how far back on ~e lots ~e homes can be sit~.~:.:,,Mr. Pec~;.stated that en~neer is wor~nz to resolve Lots 11 ~d 12 in a way that the hom~s :~,ould ~bt'have to be set back from the front prope~ tine ~:'~:~:~ 80 feet. If the setb~ck~:~ited to 100 fee2 · ey should be able to meet the 160~fo6~ lot x~4d~'~eq?irement at that point..: Mr. Peck stated ~at he ~11 supply erosion control'~dlia"t~"::the Ci~'En~xeer- ~ere ~-;~n~ livinz trees on ~e prope~', but each lot wilt be ~uired: ~:'do substmqtfal~3la'fi~s ~ the builder. Historically, s~eet names in tMs ~ea of No,fork ha~:~een ~so~f&t:ed w~t~'Bfiti~h li~s. La~ Kosh~- I3.700 ~t..~drews L~e -St~te~' ~at ~ere ~s a Msto~ ~ ~s development and there w~ supp0sed:.tb be a,~.? called Nonh'~6rk Lak~ and it ~ppears that No~ Fork Lak~ is no longer a conc~'~'It w~ su~qsed to be a comb~i6n of ~e existing ma~ade l~e to ~e e~t ~at was, 3bied to extend:6~to t~s plat. ~. PeCk r~:~'~g,,.that thi~m:.be ,no con~uation, of ~e two l~es because of ~e golf course; there is no waV,tO.co e'd'{fle ?-l aS;;7 "1989, there w~ a concept pl~ for a 3~ l~e but at ~s point ~ere h~:n6~ ~een ~y discuss[~ of one big lake for a long t~e. con~sN~. ?~e ~ading pl'~ ,dalls for some exportation of materials and he doesn't w~t ~at =a~c on residenti~ s~e:~-:'7`' ~. Peck stated:.~at there is a ~adNg pl~ that h~ been submi~ed to the CiV. At ~is point, Mr. Peck reviewet'~:~ overhead of ~e entire No,fork P.U.D. and identified the subject =ea. ~:':(?t.,o~ginal ~a~g:~lan called for exporting 800,000 yards of m=efial and mat has ~=n '%~ecause,.,.:.., th~&"~s.._ .,. no m~ket ~d North Fork is ~ing to reach finally, of this ph~e. %ere is 30 i~re's.so~:bf 153~ that the draft comprehensive plan targets for residential multiples. It is a low =Ca ~ ~'ould use some fill. The Ciw h~ an interest in taNng some of ~e fill material from St. Addition for the extension of 153~ Avenue N.W. Additional fill may ~so be needed els&where within the P.U.D..~d, 60,000-100,000 yards may go to Elk ~ver this winter. The Planning Commissiom'Januarv. _, ~ 2001 Page 4 of 15