Laserfiche WebLink
Ii <br /> <br /> Joe Volavka - 5060 143r~ Avenue N.W. - Stated that only 1 out of the 10 Holiday Stations, Stores <br /> he called was a 24 hour operation and inquired if Ramsey could reduce the proposed.~, hours <br /> operation for this new Ramsey store. <br /> <br /> Mr. Sacco stated that if there is no need for 24 hour service, the store probably wiii:no~'be kept <br /> open 24 hours a day. .~.~ ~) ...... ?--~ <br /> <br /> Chairperson Nixt noted that the station could accommodate credit card gas ptirchases that woiiici"' :: <br /> not require the convenience store to be open for business. . <br /> <br /> John Baregi noted that Holiday is the only company in .thO'.Metro are~?ihat has voluntarily <br /> implemented Sta~e I recovery to capture fumes escaped d~nr/ng the ill!lng of underground tanks <br /> ,,,,.,~,,.,and bdn~ those fumes back to the terminal to be burned'~0ff.~: .. <br /> The Commission proceeded to review the lighting, drainage, la~dS6ape.,:~ ,;::,.and screening plans. <br /> Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Commissioner Wivoddl ~f$ reco~end that City <br /> Council ~ant site plan approval to the H0hday Station Store continge)tt .UpOn :~ompliance with <br /> the City Staff Review Letter dated December' 1', 2000, and a reduction in hours of operation <br /> consistent with other similar.facilities, in close proximity to residenti~iI! neighborhoods, which <br /> hours are subject to research and recommendation by Ci~ Staff~ <br /> <br /> Motion Carded. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, ~ommission~s'Wivoda, Kociscak, Reeve, and <br /> Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: Comm/ssi0ners Griffith~~and Johnson. <br /> Case #9:. :. - ParkRep°rtDedicationOn Orchard~ FeesHills PreIiminary,,_~,:,i,,.~ ,~-.. _. Plat Traffic Generation Analysis and <br /> <br /> Ms. Wald reported that the Traffic Generation-Analysis for Orchard Hills prepared by Hakanson <br /> Anderson has been c0~pleted..-'. In SUmmary, the report indicates that there will be minimal <br /> impact to local roads as a result of the pi:oposed development. Also, the Park Commission has <br /> . "-'~ recommended a c~h 'payment to satisfy park dedication requirements for Orchard Hills. Ms. <br /> :' Wald thei~ distributed copies ora letter from Mn/DOT regarding Orchard Hills which states that <br /> a drainage p .eyrmit will be required from Mn/DOT and recommends no access to T.H.#47. <br /> <br /> Case #10: ~Monthly Status Report <br />'..-. Noted. ~' - <br /> Case #11:.. Zoning Bulletins <br /> Noted. <br /> <br /> Planning Commission/January 2, 2001 <br /> Page I4 of 15 <br /> <br /> <br />