Agenda - Council - 02/13/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Motion by Councilmember Kurak, seconded by Councilmember Anderson-, to aut~H~'k ~:~' :; Construction Company, and exe¢ffti~ri' of a~'4('J business subsidy agreement with ~con development a~eement, contingent upon review by the CiW A~omey. :%~ ~.:s'- ~ MotiOn ca~ed. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Kurak, ~~n, Hefi~d~n, and Zimme~an. Voting No: None. ~;~%.. '~.~ Case ~5: Request for a Gradag Permit to Grade and E~ S:afl~: Case of No~h City En~neer Ja~owski stated ~at on April 28, 1987,;:$~::Ciw issued a**:~4ing pe~it to L a G Rehbein and North Fork, Inc. to ~ade and excavate{~ ~::t~e No~0~k~;~.D. Subsequent to the issuance of that pe~it, the City Code peaaining ~bT~adin~a~d ~{ning pe~its was amended. In April of 1991, the pe~it was reissued in accord~c~:~lth the revised re~lations. In Au~st of 1991, that pe~it was transfe~ed from L & G R~h¢din to Ble~ Rehbin. ~e pe~it issued to Gle~ Rehbein had an.expiration date of July 31, 1 ~¢~} ~¢~it lapsed and in November of 1995, the CiW issued a hew:pg~it to complete excava~ib~ht~b~;the take area and create, wa~out sWle home site~;5:J~:.~t-:~E expired on Febma~_:~g;;:q999, prior to the exporting of the materials. Noikk:Fork}'!nc. ha~'~pPii~'for .a reissuande' 6f a grading permit to construct a second lake and c;~/{-¢ som~'~glkout style:"b!iiidi~}.~sit~{¢'~ the area of the proposed plat of St. Andrews Addition in the No~t~ork ela~nit D~i0~ment (PUD). The grading plan proposed to export approximately 3'~oi'ooo:i~.~a~'~s of san~!;~;m the 80 acre site. This is a reduction from the 800,000 yards propos~ai~:~vious appl{~ations. The applicant has stated that the reductioni~;mat~als to be exporte~:~ ~a result of decreasing the size of the lake and not trying to mak~f~he lots fu~alkouts. Thei:~E'~e s~'eral potential destinations for the exported materials:Xa};;'a project in E ,ir, iverl b) Cit}}~i~!i~;~sey street improvement project to extend 15Yd AV~nUe. NW east of~strong Boule,{~d.iNW; c) the relocation site for T & G Land in the p~-b~;S'ed Gateway In:&~rial,:Park 5; d) i'i~%ury & Carlson project. (It was reported at the Planning commi~sionthat:~fti~:fitl-may.La.!~°~be used for the outlot south of 153~d but it has been determined that he;hll:'f°r that site will come from excess soils southeast of Lake Itasca.) The .~-:;¢';~i~i~hing Commissi~ri:'C°nducted a public hearing regarding the request on January 2, 2001. ~.__:~:::,'>~Therg~:was: one resideh~i,~eserii;expressing concern with project size, erosion control, and /:~;:~¢~'- administ~afi6a, of the peri{'.! S{ibsequent to the Planning Commission meeting, the developer ?~¢::~ a.p~-i~g for the operations. The grading is proposed to be th~i~ supplied with plan grading · ~ accomplished~ccorda~ with the 13 sub-areas identified on the two-phase plat development ':~',_.:i~:.,.. plan prepared b~,~lteig Engineers, Inc. and dated January 12, 2001. The Planning Commission '~:~i.~.:. recommende4:aPproval of the request and given the scope.of the project, the standard $5,000 '::~;~¢,surety be increased accordingly. Based on a meeting with the applicant subsequent to the '*,.Planning, Cd~ission meeting, City staff recommends that the proposed findings of fact be 'arnended:~:o reflect the receipt of a phasing plan; that the permit limit excavation to no more than tw6~-areas at any given time, restrict imported materials to topsoil, and the trucks must have -108- City Council/January 23, 2001 Page 14 of 30