Agenda - Council - 02/13/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

regarding the increase in traffic. After the Planning Commission meeting the developer met' Wiih many of those residents to explain the extension of Cobalt Street and after that mee[ih~ th°se:!: residents are now in favor of the project, but that information was not reflected in the minutes for the Council to review. A letter was also sent to the City Council and staff from A1 Kempf, 15220 St. Francis Boulevard, Ramsey, stating that he was in favor of the project. Not~ng haS.' changed with the plan and the developer's cooperation with the City still standsa':~: ~ ')aeon Santers, ~5~00 Bahum Street, Rmsey, stated that he was not~rese~ d~ng the meeting when the case was discussed and wanted to cl~ that the;~bfi~ems th~ had duhng the previous Pla~ing Commission meeting have been addreSsed wit~::~he e~t~i~sion of Cobalt Street. He stated that he thins the devel~pment would be an a~s~t~:to their development and is not opposed to the project. ~::7~/~ Grant Rademacher, 14951 Zed Street, Ramsey, B~ll~g ~supere~e, stated: th~:~he ;has been working with the developer for the past year and have endo;Sed th'~;:~f0jec¢:;¢~e~ould prefer Mike Sc~eider as the developer over other developers. The Cit'~(:~iit}'be veq pleased with the product. Bill's Superette has agreed to dedicate the 60 feet for th~tension of Cobalt Street at no charge to the CiW. In regards to autlot A the developer needs ~fi~;mttlot,~4?know storage. Bill's Superette does not intend to us~"~ outlot as an access only to k~eP:~:~&d site view for Community Development D~'~Ctor F~fik inquired..~.BiU;}7.Supke~e would be willing to dedicate right of access to the state. ~ :::}~: ~53(:~:~:* Mr. Rademacher rgpliedthat that has not b~en: fi~:L:~ssed. Rick ~eye~,,.t?J 80 Bahum,S eet, Ramsey, d~bd.,t~ the engineer and the developer have been ve~ respefit~I of the conce~ of the neighborSf;:;~e is in suppo~ of the plan. %e only concern he had ~as .with minor trampling, not becausS:}'~he development, but because of the location, He i~di:r~-;~:it would b¢~5°;Sible for t~e City.fo install some type of"No ~ T~m~" on .~2: ACting ChalCerson'Jo~nson requested that staff fo~d the co~ents on silage to the CiW ~:~ Mike Sc~ei~,. Developef~:~ated that the one thing the CiW needs to consider is that they have ~. worked with ~hemeighb6~"to achieve something that works with the neighborhood and if they ~}~:4}~.~,~ were not going~tl~ough a re-plat process none of the concerns of the Council would be an issue. '~(~.~} :Acting Chameleon Jonson stated ~at he hopes the developer does not have to wait for a long "'(~'~ resol~{idn because it seems that in the absence of an ordinance this would be pe~i~ed d vet0p e t. I I I -258- Planning Commission/February 6, 2001 Page 10 ofll I I I I I I I' I I I I I I