My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/13/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 02/13/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:19:08 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 10:55:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/13/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-34- <br /> <br /> Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councihnembers Hendriksen, Zimmem~an, and <br /> Anderson. Voting No: None. Abstain: CouncilmemberConnolly. <br /> <br /> Mayor Gamec inquired if the sate of the land is a legal binding purchase agreement. <br /> <br /> City Attorney Goodrich replied that the agreement would be legally enforceable. <br /> <br /> Mayor Gamec inquired if there was any timetable or earnest money involved with the purchase <br /> of the land. <br /> <br /> City Attorney Goodrich replied that there was a timetable, but he was unsure if there was any <br /> earnest money. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated that there was no guarantee that the property would be <br />rezoned. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec inquired if there was anything binding in the sale agreement to rezone the <br />property. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich explained that one of the terms of the agreement was that the sale of the <br />property was contingent on getting the rezoning of the property and entering into a development <br />agreement. The Council is not contractually obligated to rezone the property. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson inquired as to what the legal implications would be of the City leading <br />ACCAP on, causing them to invest a lot of money on the development and then changing their <br />intentions. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that ifACCAP could prove that they acquired a personal stake in <br />the rezoning, then the City would be subjected to damages. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerlnan stated that there is never a guarantee in developing land. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson replied that this situation is slightly different because the City has <br />been a party to this all along because they are selling the land. <br /> <br />Councilmernber Zimmerman replied that they could build single fhmily residential homes. <br />Councilrnember Anderson replied that the City knew what their intentions were. <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated that they could still develop the property as it is zoned today. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Hendriksen, seconded by Councilrnember Zimmerman, to adopt <br />Resolution #00-11-310 adopting Findings of Fact #0541, as amended, relating to a request to <br /> <br /> City Council/November 28, 2000 <br /> Page 13 of 21 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.