My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/13/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 02/13/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:19:08 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 10:55:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/13/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
90,000 s uare foot meta?p~el <br /> the principal building. The site plan is proposing to construct a _ q . . . <br /> accessory building, which equates to approximately 50 percent of the gross floor spade' :of tl~b' ~.. <br /> principal building. This is a deviation from City Code and will require City Counch"aPProval. <br /> The size and proposed exterior mater/als of the accessory building is part of.~a~:negotiated <br /> settlement between the City and Mr. Sauter in a recent land swap agreement~tbr~Mi'.Sauter's <br /> lrom. <br /> property west of Sunfish Lake Boulevard. The site will derived two access b'oints "' :"'. ~41 <br /> Avenue. City Code requires all driveways and off-street parking area m':be, paved and fini~tied~:. <br /> with B-6/12 concrete curbing. The site plan indicates that the employee/cu~;mCr parking <br /> and an area to the north, east, and west of the principal building wi~l.llb~e S~aced :With <br /> pavement. The site plan is unclear as to whether or not the bi~in0us ~ife'a will be finished with <br /> the required concrete curbing. It is anticipated that the pa~bd?~trea will";i~ot be finished with <br /> concrete curbing due to an agreement between the City and'Mr. Sauter in a recent land swap ~:~?? <br /> settlement. Deviation from the required concrete curbing will require-City Council approval. <br /> The off-street parking area for trucks and equipment Ipeated. to .l[he no~.0f-tbe.~pnnc~pal bml&ng <br /> is proposing to be absent of the required bituminous pavement, The site plan is proposing to <br /> surface the off-street parking area with Class I~. This is a deViati0~'~'from City Code and will <br /> require City Council approval. In the past, the City has waived tl4:~-Pa~ement requirement when <br /> it was not reasonable due to the type of equipment maneuvering on ~?i"!Staffye~6~ended that <br /> this off-street parking area at a minimtimC~)nsist of Class V recycled ag~egafe!~rface..._ The City <br /> is constructing a pond to the north}and nor~hwestOf the subject propert~2-"and the proposed Class <br /> II surface would permit more mi~ati3n ~)f smal~"~arti~i'ds:into the pond 'an~i may overtime lessen <br /> the effectiveness of the pond." The CliO'Engineer is?qU~t~g th'~t temporary and permanent <br /> erosion control measures be taken for thdpropo?d*~tid stor~2e-are~ located along the western <br /> property line and for the off-street parking:are~t~t will b4ia~Sent of bituminous pavement. <br /> The exterior building materials for the priffcipal"'~structure af'~ proposed to consist of pre-cast <br /> concrete panels:with-a '"Pre-finished met~l:-:fascia; this meets the architectural standards <br /> established ~the business::district. The ac~e~so.ry*;building is proposing to consist of metal <br /> panels; thi'~'i:S"a deviation frb'm City Code and~'4)ilf're~uire City Council 'approval. The proposed <br /> screening along the south/seakt, and west pro~perty lines meet City Code requirements. The <br /> landscaping'plan is acceptable.- Staff reque~i~ihat additional foundation plan'tings be installed <br /> around the principal structure.:: The thcili .W?Mll be served by on-site sewer and water facilities. <br /> The site plan is absent6f a lighting plar~.'~'A lighting plan will need to be submitted and is subject <br /> ~ tO'the City Engineei's ~pproval. The Planning Commission reviewed the site plan on January 2, <br /> ..~ '.;.~.'i~.~-~-' ~(~0'i-'.~ 'Site plans are not'-~ub_ jecl~-.to a public hearing, however during the public hearing for the <br />/.-./preliminary Plat of the pr0Pos~ed Gateway North Industrial Park No. 5, a representative from <br />i. :'Danny's Tra~nn.y spoke m.re~ard to the proposed development. Danny's Tranny has some <br />~ reservations irk regard to the Gateway North Industrial Park No. 5 redevelopment project and how <br />..- the future westerly extension of 141 Avenue will affect their business. The Planning <br /> .... Commission ree°mmended that the City Council grant site plan approval contingent upon <br /> ---:~- _ compliance~Wi~ City staff review letter dated December 29, 2000. <br /> <br /> "C0dncilme~ber Anderson requested clarification if the applicant was requesting two deviations <br /> from City Code, one for the 20,000 square feet, and the second for the metal building. <br /> <br />City Council/January 9, 2001 <br /> Page 14 of 34 <br /> <br />-60- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.