Agenda - Council - 02/13/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Mayor Gamec inquired if the extension of Cobalt Street to 153ra Avenue would be co~ct~d ~ right away. /~:~i~) Mr. Slettner replied yes. ~?:' '~ Councilmember Anderson stated that she is pleased to see the towefT'~d~mity and developer has been will~g to work with the City to co~ect the drainage prob~in the area. that the were five residents who gave some opposition to the development, d:.)}7)?:z:~.~_~ ~;:: ' ? Mr. Slettner replied that one of the things they were concerned about waste mimmum s~de ya d setback which is 12 to 20 feet and when they were i~p~:aa'~at the sidd~;a setbacks would be 22.5 feet they were comG~able with that. ~ Councilmember Hendfiksen inquired if the residents who spok~; a~ ~e mla~ing CO~ission would be opposed to ~e develOpment today. "~'::~,:~i,:5-, :51:(;:;;~ Mr. SleUner replied that in his opf~i0.n:~'}ii:'~:~t~:e:;re~idents that spoke ~0hld be in favor of the Councilmember Henddksen stated that ~fi~e ~mr~fi~n a n~:d¢¢~lopment is being proposed and traffic generation analysis is complet~:d~ere ~'~e~s to be-~ ~0hpafison of traffic prior to the development and.:.::: a~er~-,:~: '--~e development. 'c,:; ;:¢, Co~u~ty DeVdopment D~ector Frolik repined t)a~they will do that in the hmre. Councit~e~ber Hendfikse~ ~ated that Mr. was required to comply with the Cheer ~e~dmeh~:f0~: his devel°P~entCp~al[=d P'°hds and asked why this development should be treated differentia; ~4??~b~fi~c~member ~a~on replied that ~e developer in ~is situation has reduced the densi~ Councflmemb~ Hendnksen:mqulred xf the development complies with the Cha~er ~endment City Attorney,S'Goodrich stated that there needs to be some finding as to how the Cha~er ':~2;.:~ ~implications.~ere addressed in the development. '~hncil~ber Hendfiksen inquired as to how the Council can justi~ saying that one developer ha~t6;follow the Charier and the other does not. -70- City Council/January 9, 2001 Page 24 of 34 I I I I