Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />28 seconds a distance of 467.89 feet; thence South 11 degrees 47 minutes 32 seconds <br />East, tangent to last said curve a distance of 164.54 feet; thence southerly and <br />westerly along a tangential curve concave to the west having a radius of 295.27 feet, <br />a central angle of 101 degrees 11 minutes I3 seconds, a distance of 521.46 feet; <br />thence South 89 degrees 23 minutes 42 seconds West, tangent to last said curve a <br />distance of 210.53 feet and said centefline there terminating. <br /> <br />(" Subject Property"); and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the Applicant is proposing to develop a multi-family housing project <br />(twinhomes, quad-townhomes, and a four-plex) on an 11.3 acre site which includes the Subject <br />Property; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, nine acres of the 11.3 acre project site is zoned R-3 Urban Residential; the <br />remaining 2.3 acres is zoned R-1 Urban Residential and requires a rezoning to R-3 Urban <br />Residential to accommodate the proposed development project; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the City has received testimony from some surrounding property owners <br />that they believe that their property value will be diminished due to this rezoning; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the rezoning of the R-1 Urban Residential portion of development area to <br />R-3 Urban Residential is critical to the proposed subdivision and site plan submitted to the City <br />for approval; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, on November 28, 2000, the City Council adopted Findings of Fact #0541 <br />regarding the proposed rezoning; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, on February 27, 2001, the City Council adopted a resolution to deny the <br />proposed rezoning. <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br /> <br />'That the City Council herein denies fmal plat approval of the proposed subdivision, <br />Sunwood Estates, based on the absence of appropriate zoning to accommodate the <br />development plan that has been proposed to the City. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember __ <br /> , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />and the following abstained: <br /> <br />and the following were absent: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #01-02- <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br />-161- <br /> <br /> <br />