Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> l <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />6 February 2001 <br /> <br />City of Rantsey . <br />1.5153 Nowthtm Boulevard N.W. <br />Ramiey Minnesota 55303 <br /> <br />Conditional Use Permii Application, Theresa Dahlheimer <br /> <br />Please consider our comnmnts regarding the application of Theresa Dalhiemer requesting a Conditional <br />Use Permit which would allow her to maintain horses on her property. <br /> <br />We own the 6.8 piece of property behind Mark and Theresa D~lheimer's residence and are former <br />neighbors having owned the proper%, now owned by the Sw~,nson's. On two occasions we had a si§ned <br />agrmunent for them to purchase the 6.g acre property. Both times, the agreements fell through due to <br />insufficient funds. <br /> <br />We feel that Theresa does take good care of her horses and would-not want to do anything to hinder her <br />chances of keeping her horses on the property but also feel that we need to protect our interests in our <br />property. We feel that she should be allowed to keep 2 horses on her own property, We have reservations <br />about allowing her to lea.se acreage in order m have mare than 2 horses on the property. The main reason <br />for this is because of the length of the agreement which we understand extends to a new owner of the <br />property should Mark and Theresa sell. I understand there are other conditions which would void the <br />agreement if they are not md and would like to have the ownership of the property be one of them. <br />Therefore il' Mark and Thersa should sell, the agreement would be voided. And likewise if the people <br />lea~ing the property m them (I assume C-rag Matuseski) should se. Il, it would void the conditional use <br />permit. <br /> <br />Several years ago we gave Mark & Theresa permission to run a fence across a corn~' of our 6.8 parcel <br />allowing access to the leased land but ~ked them to remove the fence when we had the property for sale. <br />We have not been able to visually impect the fence to make sure it is not encrouching our property and <br />therefore can not endorse such an agreement at this time. <br /> <br />Additionally, we have res~vafions about manure and other mfme being dumped on our 6.8 acre property <br />as it has been done in the paxt and are concerned that thi~ practice may be continuing without our <br />knowledge. <br /> <br />We also have concerns that the Dahlheimer's barn is situated too close m the Swanson's proper~y line and <br />are mentioning this because we have an agreement for a road easement with the Swanson's in order to get <br />back to the 6.8 parcel of property. I believe they are violating City Code of being 75 f~t from propm'ty <br />lines with their barn. <br /> <br />We will not be able to attend the Planning and Zoning meeting be/rig ~eld this evening a~d would likt~ to <br />request minutes of ~he meeting. Could you let me know when these minutes would be available? I can be <br />reached at 763-572-7007 during the day. <br /> <br />Thank you, <br /> <br />Carl McCollum <br /> <br /> -77- <br />TnT~I_ P.Ot <br /> <br /> <br />