Agenda - Council - 04/10/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Councilmember Hendriksen stated when he read the document, it purported to be the r~dl/ne version of the ordinance. However, the redline ordinance and other ordinance were twokeP~t~a~e.~ documents and this is yet a third document. He stated the redline document did nO~t~refl'ect language in the ordinance and now this is a third document and not a tree and co~e:ci'reflection of what the motion was or the ordinance that was introduced. -~ ~:; '~.'-'~"' "~ ? Councilmember Zimmerman stated he voted for the ordinance on the ~e~iFes that it include that the homeowners could inspect but that has been taken out::;:~ ?~;::~_.. Mayor Gamec stated the motion was to remove Section 5 .,~ Counci~ember Zi~e~an stated he misunderstood that"~i~'(~'s remou~ CiW Aaomey Goodrich stated the section remov~d}':was::'hot introduce-~d eve~hing but Section f w~ introduced. But, Councilmember Hendfiksen }snOw ~di:bh'ting~t~s document does not reflect that revised ordinance. He reco~ended the CoundiI delay action to allow ~m and Principal Pla~er Tmdgeon to compare the two documents ahd.~'dete~ine if, there are any discrepancies. Councilmember Hendfiksen sugge~ted a fbdess.~ d~lared to allow that to 0Cdur. Mayor Gamec recessed the regh. I~ Ci¢C;uncil meetifig a~': 8:52. Mayor Gmec called the regular City coUncil meeting back to ~fd;r 9:02 p.m. City A~omey G0~fich stated he and PfinciPat~ Pla~er Tmdgeon reviewed all t~ee documents that were handed out and dete~ined the version'toni~t matches the other distributed document. He expla~~ that the only ~g that varies is ~e-fddline version in issues related to Section f ~d hom~°Wner ~spections~:He explained th~t~the document handed out removed reference to prop~ bmef inspectiofi~-" He ,stated he ~' gafisfied the ordinance was properly introduced and available for adoption, ~th6at:S~fi0nT ~;;~7:~.~:'''' CPHhcipal Pla~er Thdg~n stated his agement and explained the redline version was used as a '-~i~U:al'aid:--By mistake sine lan:~uage was not included that should have been included. CiW A~omey Goodrich:rated the removal of Section f does not ch~ge the intent of the ordnance. '7~ ,_~ Motion by Coundilmember ~derson, seconded by Councilmember Kurak, to adopt Ordin~ng9 No. 01- ~ ~rdinance ~ending Section 8.30 "Sewage Disposal Systems" of Chapter 8 of the ' -~tCity Code:o~R~sey, Mi~esota. Fu~h~ discussion: Councilmember Hendhksen stated if adopted, this Ordinance will require ev~ resident to pay to have their septic system inspected ~d pumped eve~ t~ee years and -102- City Council/March 13, 2001 Page 20 of 31 I i I I! I I I I I I I I