My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/10/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 04/10/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:20:53 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 11:44:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/10/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Gamec replied that it would be interesting to have an area to do a study. ~.;;i~~. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Hendr/keen stated that the Met Council's "grand design" is to tat~'~!i~:'-area with <br /> five lots and then split them into 30 or 40 lots. ~ ~':~:~'i'?:~' ":'~i!iiii:~i~ii~:; <br /> <br /> Councilmember Zimmerman stated that the urban reserve study are~5;~, not part <br /> comprehensive plan when they started the planning process and he di~d~not se~ii:ifeason to <br /> it at this point. ~-,~.!?;'(':!ii!'1%.~ ':~';? <~ii~.:~ <br /> Councilmember Hendriksen noted that the urban reserve ?U~.:¢~ea~.:, ~4~., was~-~,~:~;~} one of the agreed <br /> upon items in the November 7, 2000 le~er. ,~?:~?~ :;: <br /> Ci, Administrator No, an replied that the urb~ re~:):~dY area w~?~:Tadded to the le~er <br /> dated November 7, 2000 so the Council should not ~0nside~f~m t~'~e.'~':~.-No~an stated <br /> that there was a lot of discussion during the last Council me'~n~-:~k~ding land use and that <br /> several changes needed to be made to the land use map. He inq~i~d.:as to what those changes <br /> should be. '?;~'7~;~. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Zi~e~an stated'tfia~ ~:I'~d Use map dated M~ch 8,--~'7999-~dicates the l~d <br /> east of Sunfish Lake Boulev~dTa~3,0:~ts p~"a~re ~nd the most r~de~ land use map has it <br /> zoned low and medium densiW:" He fel~ ~at the prop'~-~gh;Tuld~b~'-"all low densiW at 3.0 uNts <br /> per acre. In the area be~een C.R. g56:and C.R.;:~83' the Ci'¢?haS been holding the land for <br /> indusMal development for 20 years and J0~ ~ther~.i{;"talk of d~¢~i;ping the land into residential <br /> and he was not s~e~at is the best hmre'me;fof"the CiW o~amsey. He suggested exploring <br /> · e option of plac~g high~ densiW on the ~a~u~herly edge of the golf course. Mr. Zi~e~ <br /> also stated that the Council-~eds to dete~ifi4 if Cek)~can agee on a location for the co~uter <br /> <br /> Mayor~Ga~ea' replied [h~ ~e !0caliph of ~,~uter rail station should be dete~ined a~er <br /> <br /> · -~:C~Levine noted th[t ~e Rmsey Boulevard location of the co~uter rail station is not "cast in The location 0~the sfifion could be moved to the west if the Council so chooses. <br /> <br /> Councilmemb~ Zi~e~eplied that he had he~d that if the station was not adjacent to a <br /> Coun~ road th~City would have to pay for it. <br /> <br /> Ci~ Admi~s~tor No,an explained that there is a FDA requirement that there must be a ~ad~ <br />~' ~;:~.? :~: crossing for p~estfians ~d if the station is not adjacent to a Coun~ road then some ~pe of <br /> ': ',, ~Ossing 0v~r.the rail road ~acks would have to be constructed. <br /> <br /> CoUnci~ember Hendfiksen inquired as to how large the platfo~ would have to be on either <br /> side of the tracks. <br /> <br /> Ci~ Counc~February 20, 2001 <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br /> <br />-40- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.