My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/10/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 04/10/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:20:53 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 11:44:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/10/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Natalie Haas Steffen replied that it is not the intention of the Met Council to subdivide <br />She explained that in an attempt to finalize the City's Comprehensive Plan the Met <br />agreed to the four terms agreed to by the City Council and she is trying to make <br />Met Council to back off the one in ten acre requirement. She explained that <br />have made similar requests regarding the rural preserve area, red flags are <br />substantial deviation from the regional blueprint so she asked for <br />the City of Blaine there was a large lot and smaller lots and <br />wanted to do with the property. The Met Council agreed to leave <br />determine at a future date as to what they would like to do with, <br />that the study area is simply a compromise for backing of-fi: <br /> <br /> has <br />the <br /> <br /> a <br /> )ff one in <br /> they <br /> could <br /> explained <br />preserve area. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated that he thought it <br />would not require City sewer and water down <br /> <br />)olicy Council that they <br /> <br /> Ms. Steffen replied that the study would not require the City to and water to the <br /> area. It would simply be an area designated for a future study as a ~.~,~,f, getting~.:~;. <br /> Comprehensive Plan approved. ~. ',~g~;~:~ ~;;;,~;:z~ <br /> <br /> Councilmember Hendnksen stated?that m~y:t~gs:::~pme fo~d as pl~}~r study area and <br /> then develop a hfe of their ow~ ~d' b~e m aat <br /> Mayor Gamec noted that the CiW Counc~;~ould-sti~hve to ~eTtBe final decision, if CiW <br /> sewer and water would be extended. <br /> <br /> Mr. Steffen expla~ed"~'-- :that~the~ Met Council indicate when the study would have to <br /> take place. It~i~ :Simply a ~b~ure to get the Plan approved. <br /> <br /> Council~ember Hendfikseh'ih~uired as to box it was to couple the issue with the <br /> No~h Star C0~dor to thi:(':~:'r Plan. He explained ~at a lot of <br /> the disa with the location of the station and what <br /> naturally flows ~i~b~station. He suggested completely removing the issue from the table at <br />.~;:~;;' 'flus point and then ~hfidle it with a transpo~ation overlay once the CiW has more answers. <br /> <br /> that ifthe:CaSncil moves along on all the issues holding up the <br /> Ms. <br /> ComprehenS/V~'Plan then'ihCJi;Ppomnity site ~ant can be awarded. If the Council is moving in <br /> that direction ~;:2is prep~bd to put an offer in ~ont of me Council reg~ding the oppom~W <br /> gant site that Shb'thought the Council could accept. <br /> <br /> Councilmemb~"Hendfiksen stated that he does not want to work tkough ce~ain issues that <br /> might "leave the door open" for t~ngs he might object to. He thins the No~h St~ Condor <br /> Station shoUld be .handled as a separate issue. ~e issue with the station is that along with the <br /> station comes the idea that there will be a lot of"roof tops" witch waling distance of the <br /> <br />City Council/January 23, 2001 <br /> Page 3 of 10 <br /> <br />-75- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.