My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/10/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 04/10/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:20:53 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 11:44:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/10/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Anderson pointed out that the majority of the land is designated as "places:t6 <br /> work". <br /> <br /> Councilmember Hendriksen replied that he disagrees with a station being placed in"ff~'i~enter of <br /> Armstrong Boulevard and Ramsey Boulevard because the rest of the land will,bS:~ai'~'Pi~6~ by <br /> townhomes. ,i;,::!!ii '~}¢'~' <br /> <br /> City Administrator Norman replied that zoning would control that. ~ ,~,.: ": :.~5~5.?. <br /> <br /> Councllmember Hendrlksen stated that he would hke to see the:mii~d use:~area located west of <br /> Armstrong Boulevard as well as the North Star Corridor st~ti0~}?" %?: <br /> Ms. Steffen replied that if the area is moved west of ~~ng, then t~'g:}city..will be out for the <br /> opportunity grant. Cal Thorp would be doing a marke{ilS~d~as to viabteT!~hd':mes around the <br /> station, which would be very valuable to the City. Th; City $~am,s~¢;~ld::~¢t to move the <br /> rail station to the alternative location within the site boundaries :~i~6fi:t compromising the site <br /> analysis done today, but the decision needs to be completed soon a'fi:d~'ahould be included in the <br /> <br /> Counc~lmember Hendnksen stated'that there, may:bed s~gmficant cost to. the,C~ty by doing the <br /> wrong thing. To proceed forwai*~d}',,the: ~iiy need~ {¢:haV~a;Comprehens~}~ Plan at the Met <br /> Council which would have to fi ally b4:~l~Proved by th~ Ch{ir~ City;,~uncil. Three of the <br /> members could forward the most recent 3~gft down,t~ ~:¢ Met ~8~61i, but it would not receive <br /> the votes needed when it is sent back to th:e ~ity.C;~il for ap~fSval. <br /> <br /> Ms. Steffen replie~t:}ihat:';Sg~Would expect tha{:if another,, Plan is sent down to the Met Council, <br /> that it be done-'~8 :With a foU[Tfffihs of five-zerb?ote~;':;,, <br /> Councithmber Anderson i:hquired if the Coun~iI~:~eed to move forward with the Plan and <br /> leave :~¢;~igfi:of land mi~ed ~se, ,and at the':~da::of the study period the Council wants no part of <br /> what is prop°~edwoutd ~6:'~S:~i0fig;'~/{~'ihe City. <br /> <br /> ~-;:: :;} MS! Steffen replied ~}i):She explained that the study will be presented to the citizens. <br /> <br /> Council~mber HendrikS;~ ~;Pl'i'~d that the problem becomes the fact that the City would have <br /> an approved: C~mprehens :~ian that has certain legal implications· <br /> <br />~i'-: ¢::.~., Ms. Steffen stated that she sees two area as being problematic. One has to do with what the area <br /> "~:~ '~.-. between RamseyBoulevard and Armstrong Boulevard should be designated. <br /> <br /> ':~: )eopncilmemtS~r Hendriksen replied that currently the western half of the property is designated <br /> h~ ~!ed flsa'and within the mixed use designation is a transportation hub being a permitted use. <br /> So .as:S~:~n as the Council votes for the Comprehensive Plan as proposed, a transit hub could be <br /> sited,~ithin that location. <br /> <br />-80- <br /> <br />City Council/January 23, 2001 <br /> Page 8 of 10 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.