Agenda - Council - 04/24/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

subdivisions. However, the adjacent property owners are aware of Mr. Nordvik's plan because of the public hearing that was conducted relating to the variance to 4 units in 40 acres restriction. The minor subdivision will create two new lots from one existing lot. house on the southern part of the existing lot. After the platting, the existin located on Lot 1, Block 1, of the new plat. Lot 2, Block 1, would be a new The existing residence has on-site sewer and water systems. The new lot will with private on-site sewer and water systems. She noted that Lot 2 will meet lot size requirement. The southerly 37.5 feet of Lot 1 is proposed corridor purposes. Therefore, Lot 1 is approximately 2.2 acres in size. remnants meeting 75% of the lot size requirement to be platted right-of-way can be used to meet minimum lot area rec Attorney has determined that trail corridors are meet minimum lot sizes. Therefore, Lot 2 at 2.2 acres Director Frohk noted the property ~s ~n the Rural Tr n Area restriction of 4 units in 40 acres. The lot split does~:~ ly with 2000, the Board of Adjustment granted a variance to the She noted the minimum lot width and explained that in this both homes Mil use two existing accesses onto County Road lots are at least 200 feet wide adjacent to County Road #83. However, Code states that between a local street and a County or State ro ~a.~hhe;:~veway should access Eland Street stubs into the subject property fro.~z ~..h.:~ii~d.~could serve Lot 2. Development Director Frolik stated staff woult~;i~:~'~end ~i~?,~i:i.~.o..existing ]ri onto County Road #83 be utilized as temporary:'adCess. ~::~e minor subd :-~deielopment agreement should reqmre that ~f and when the property sU~i.v~des ~i; both ays will be converted to a local street interior to the plat. To facilit~{~ithis ~p~ :~taff is~ ting that the corridors for the extension of Eland Street from the north an~;~tS~7~ Avenue from the east be preserved w~thin the plat boundaries,bg!,linear l~arks and drainag~,~d utility easements. At the time the property is further sub&~ded, or uponIhe C~ty s request~es~7~asements would be conveyed to the C~ty for road n'~..t-'of-way purposes. Commumt¥~;~ 'opment D~rector Frohk adwsed that Mr. Nordwkand she &scussed~fhis and he ~s conc~ w~th that proposed term ~n the development agreement reqUmng him, 26'.i~tu~, over the~ght-of-way at the C~ty' request. Mr. Nordvik's concern ~s that ~f.th~ CLW~wo~c[igeea~:~he,.i~Street extended to the south, the C~ty could spht his property in half ~'i~-tUi~e of him ~;}'~':~hy to develop his property. She stated she did ask the ~.,~:~:City?Attorney if th"e~e'ils.a way to preserve that corridor to assure it can be developed when Mr. :~('~'¢)~('5;~i;N~rd~'~s' ready. C0~uni~;;.Development Frolik stated the developer is responsible for providing fhe City with ~ilr~d~,ision plan to show an ultimate plan for the property if and when it is S&'~ed by City. s~ and water. A plan has been provided but should be modified to reflect the 37'.'5:7;fOot wid~'!~k corridor along the south property boundary. She advised that the . ~. ,., ..... Park Comm~ssx0n rewewed the proposed sub&wmon on March 8, 2001 and recommend dedication of a".,tr~il extension along the south boundary of the plan. The remainder of the park dedication du~"~'ould be satisfied with a cash payment. City staff recOmmends approval of the "<~;'i~ii:,:'. ~ nor subdi~iSi0n. Mbii6n 'b3; Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Commissioner Reeve, to approve the sketch plan for Nordvik Addition and recommend that the applicant proceed to the final plat stage contingent Planning Commission/April 3, 2001 Page 17 of 18 allows l~f:~ Also ro ad ',~, ~-~ also be used to Development there is a density On December 5, · e lot split. is proposing that -37-