Agenda - Council - 05/22/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-24- Members thought the study was to only address the frontage road system, however, the study went beyond frontage road issues and addressed land use issues. Once the redevelopment study has been adopted, the Board would like to see guidelines put in place for development in the area. The case was tabled until the next meeting when staff will bring the study back for more in depth review. / ' Case #2: Potential QCTV Relocation QCTV lost some studio space and is looking to relocate in one of th~:i~d ~i~i'~g. The City is looking at a parcel for them to relocate to. "?--i_.:.. Councilmember Kurak was present and addressed the memb~i':? She is a member of'the!~Cable . , '.. Commission and at their recent meeting they decided to.bUild their own building rather thar~ rent space. They are now looking for a location and are n6~}o:'aking for g/~fi~g· of land at this ~ime. QCTV would be a non-taxable property. EDA action not required at this time. Case #3: Industrial Development Pr6jeists, ~s case was tabled until the next meeting. Members would like more ~f~ati-~n on the procesS*of TIF. ~e consensus of the Board is that the TIF Specialist should-be a~end~g~'"~e EDA me~gs. Two it--s members ~uld like to d~ss~.e: 1) How much assistance ~e C~'shoUl&~vd'mpOt6ntial new businesses. 2) IfEDA should rec0~mend~ recipien~-;b'f-SiF money should be required to pay employees a mind,to'rs:!2.00 Perhour rather than the cu~ent $10.00 per hour. Memb~ requested th~Tk,histo~o'f~I~ projects and hoW incentives are ~yen to business be on ~'~e agenda. Motion b~'Mmber Tme2an, seconded by Member Riley, to adjoum the meet~g. Motion ca~ed. '~6tmg Yes: Chaicerson Wa~er, Zi~e~an, Riley, ~d ~derson. Voting No: None. Absent: Members Blaha, LeToumeau and Scheiber. Economic Development Authority/May 7, 2001 Page 2 of 3 I I I I I I I I I I ,I I I I