Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Sweet stated that the site is currently a mess and trees are currently being moved <br />and inquired as to what was taking place. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wald noted that staff has asked that the developer provide a tree preservation <br />plan. <br /> <br />Commissioner Reeve inquired if staff has had any discussions with the applican~ :regarding <br /> the <br /> <br />City Staff letter. <br /> <br />Community Development Assistant Wald replied yes, noting that the apPiicasit'has agreed to do <br />everything included in the letter. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner'R/~kes, to table acti~¢/~til after <br />Case gl 0 to give the applicant time to be present for the disc~si:isns. <br />Motion carried <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Co~!~sionerS-';'j~hnson, Reeves, Kociscak, <br />Sweet, and Wivoda. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #7: Request for Preliminary Plat ApPi~oval.of The P;~ds;.. Case Of Royal Oaks <br /> Realty <br /> <br /> Ch3irperson Nixt closed the regular portion ofth~ ~t~ing Commission meeting at 8:11 p.m. in <br /> order' to call the public heahng:to order. :?~;; . <br /> <br />Pr/n~ip~l Planner Trudge°n stated thatRoy~l"Oaks Re .a.l. tf has submitted a preliminary plat <br />sh~'Vqng the development ~f. 86.71 iC:~-es at the ~'d ~m~..~,'/of Dysprosium St. and Nowthen <br />B;fiieVard. Royal Oaks R~ealty is proposing to.d~vel/Sp...7,3 single-family lots, 152 townhome <br />units' aiid 87 apartment units~°n this prope~-y:/The prope'~'y..~as removed from the development <br />moratorium.on February I6~ 2001 ;~-s~rt of this plat, the a¢i~li, cant is also asking to rezone the <br />property to"plarmedunii D .e..vel~6~)ment (P.U.D.), to receive a vareC'an.ce from the height <br />restrictions fo'r-th~Pr.°Pos~'~l apartment building, and site plan approvkt-a of the townhouse <br />develo ment and'ii"artment bmld~ng The property ~s currently zoned R-"I ;,S,!ngle Famdy and - <br /> P ' P ' · "" D <br />1, Business. A:~ mentioned above, the applicant is asking for a rezomng ofthe'pr.o:p, erty to P.U.. <br />The March'2001 Draft Comprehensive Plan shows a total of 7.52 acres of this proCa~t~.b..eing <br />High Density Residential, 13 57 acres being Medium Density Residential and 65.67 ac~:,as <br />L$'w Densi Residential The number of units that the development shows is less than the ?.. <br /> ty . <br /> <br />Planning Commission/June 5, 2001 <br /> Page 8 of 30 <br /> <br />-176- <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> <br />