Laserfiche WebLink
Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Johnson, Kociscak, Reeves and <br />Watson. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #6: Request for Site Plan Review; Case of SW Wold: North Pine Office <br /> <br />Community Development Assistant Wald stated that SW Wold is proposing to construct a <br />12,335 square foot multi-tenant office building on the property at the <br />intersection of 153rd Avenue and State Highway #10. The applicant is to construct a <br />multi-tenant office facility on a 1.7-acre parcel. The property is office <br />facilities are a permitted use. The office facility will consist of two floor will be <br />9,379 square feet in size and the second floor will contain 2,956 total office <br />building area of 12,335 square feet. The proposed building exc rear and <br />side yard setbacks established in the B-1 Business District. to <br />35% of the lot area; the site plan is proposing a 16% lot <br />all driveways, off-street parking and maneuverin <br />bituminous pavement and finished with B-6Z12 <br />of 55 parking spaces for the proposed office facility. <br />employee parking stalls. The building elevation plan <br />will consist of rock face concrete block <br />deviation from city code and will require <br />to excavate and utilize City owned <br />proposed drainage plan would be <br />therefore limiting future development's <br />development capacity calculations to <br />City owned property <br />derive one access point,ff~:'~i 53 <br />#10. Staff sent a cop~i!0~':ihe proposg~'kite plan <br />the parcel boarderS'i)S:tate Hi <br />Services are not availabl:eto <br />system. If the compreh~X;¢!:~', i~:~n is adopted with a policy statement requiring urban services <br />for co~iY~'717~!~l¢¥elopn~'~f'.i:'iStaff is recommending that the development permit reqUire <br />conneati~n'~ ~°-'hi:b'~hi;i~S~'~ices '~n. 2 years of availability. The Landscaping Plan is' generally <br />accePi~iBle. The sit~'<P'l~, shoL~i~i~;,revised to include a tree preservation plan. City Code <br />re~i~es commercial de~e!ff~ments %fb"comply with park and trail dedication requirements. The <br />park: an.d recreational traili!:::~lan is providing for a pedestrian trail along the southern boundary <br />line ~:~-.the subject propert~?}it is the City's intention to have the trail on. the subject property link <br />to the ~X.isfing North, ~ pedestrian trail. The site plan should be revised to include the <br />required pedestrian tr, a~lS~ilong the southern boundary line and it will be the responsibility of the <br />developer to ~i3~t~{:ihe pedestrian trail to City standards. City staff recommended site plan <br /> ":~. :~! ~ <br />approval contingent upon compliance with City Staff Review Letter dated May 25, 2001. <br /> <br /> a minimum <br /> 62 customer and <br /> the exterior wall materials <br /> )osed vinyl siding is a <br /> plan is proposing <br /> property. The <br />City property and <br />requesting pre and post <br />of the proposed drainage plan on the <br />5erties. The development is proposing to <br />will be derived from State Highway <br />for their review and comment since <br />edge of the boundary line. Urban <br />proposed to be served by an on-site septic <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Kociscak, to recommend that the <br />City Council approve the proposed site plan for a multi-tenant office building contingent upon <br />compliance with City staff review letter dated May 25, 2001. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/June 5, 2001 <br /> Page 24 of 30 <br /> <br />.~209- <br /> <br /> <br />