Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />'1 <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />comments made regarding the water levels of the existing wetlands, the entire project is within <br />the same water subdistrict and all of the run-off will stay within the district. He does not <br />anticipate that there be will be an impact on the ground water levels. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson inquired in regards to the large drainage pond being proposed. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowsk/replied that the ponds will need to be constructed to <br />which at the water level there will be a 10 to 1 bench to prevent a steep slope. <br /> <br />standards, <br /> <br />Dave Putnam, Engineer, Midwest Land Surveyors, stated that the <br />located in the proposed location because it is were it will functio~ <br />suggested by residents for the pond would placing the retention <br />is a designated wetland and they are not allowed to pond <br /> <br />a natural <br /> <br />identified and <br /> location <br /> which <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson inquired as to what could be <br />neighbors. <br /> <br />impact on ~g <br /> <br />Mr. Putnam replied that the pond would be designed <br />normal water value in it. As they ,get to the level they <br />will contain four to five feet of standing w~ <br /> <br />flat slopes and will have a <br />out even further. The pond <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson inquired as to what <br /> <br />Mr. Putnam replied that <br />turf. He suggested that <br />will have to meet the <br /> <br />Resident inquired if~t?:,pond <br /> <br />with <br /> <br /> coverage other than mowed <br />to see what Iris desires are, but noted they <br /> <br />Mr. Putnam.,. replied that be circulation through the pond. <br /> <br />Chairp.~S:(~"'~i~::i':~ta~bd that'¢!~eems prudent that since there are only four ponds for the <br />derv,616Pment that sorfi;:'~x~estmeh~!~h!;;~Creening might be appropriate to break up the layout. <br /> <br />commissioner Johnson recommended that staff facilitate a discussion on this issue with the <br />develbP~r;.:engineer and ~operty owners. He also inquired if there was any vegetation cover <br /> <br />Principal Plann'er:Tmdgeon replied that the City requires a tree preservation plan be included for <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson inquired if tree preservation was done to complete the roadway and <br />sidewalks would the City control the tree preservation when they did the pad development on' <br />each lot. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/June 5, 2001 <br /> Page 16 of 30 <br /> <br /> <br />