My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/26/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 06/26/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:24:07 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 12:47:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/26/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
449
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-38- <br /> <br /> 3) The request that bowstring trusses in apparatus be painted. <br /> <br /> Mayor Gamec inquired if Mr. Kapler felt that the City should reduce the Iiquidated damages by <br /> the $5,000. <br /> <br /> Director of Public Works/Fire Chief Kapler replied that the $5,000 reduction could be viewed as <br /> a legitimate request. <br /> <br /> Mayor Gamec stated that he did not see any reason for holding a joint meting. He felt that the <br /> City was entitled to the $38,5000. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Hendriksen stated that the City should not start negotiations at $38,500, but <br /> should start at $43,500. He did not think that the City should concede certain things and then <br /> negotiate on what is left. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Anderson inquired if the City had anticipated the additional $15,000 cost from <br /> S.E.H. <br /> <br /> Director of Public Works/Fire Chief Kapler replied that they did know that as the project <br /> continued to be delayed that they would incur additional costs. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Hendriksen inquired as to who would pay for the additional $15,000. <br /> <br /> Director of Public Works/Fire Chief Kapler replied that it would probably be paid for out of the <br /> liquidated damages the City receives. <br /> <br /> Mayor Gamec stated that he did not see any reason to negotiate the amount of liquidate damages. <br /> Councilmember Zimmerman inqui'red as to what the $15,000 cost was for. <br /> <br />Director of Public Works/Fire Chief Kapler replied that the cost was for additional site visits, <br />correspondence, and many meetings with Ebert Construction. <br /> <br />Consensus of the Council was to direct staff to inform Ebert Construction that the Council is not <br />willing to negotiate the amount of liquidated damages. <br /> <br />2) Aerial Ladder Fire Truck Financing <br /> <br />Director of Public Works/Fire ChiefKapler stated that the Council had requested that he look <br />into the following five issues pertaining to the aerial ladder truck: <br /> <br />1) What is done with buildings of heights greater than the reach of apparatus? <br /> Per the Uniform Building Code, buildings higher than 75 feet must be constructed per Type <br /> 1, or non-combustible materials. This is designed to contain fire to a certain area for a <br /> <br /> City Council/May 15, 2001 <br /> Page 2 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.