Laserfiche WebLink
foot increase in payment for the higher strength block. This would relate to an increase of <br />$11,225. <br /> <br />Finally, safety railing needs to be placed along the top of the wall where the drop exceeds a <br />certain height, generally 3.5 to 4.0 feet. One portion of the retaining wall near Armstrong Blvd. <br />is nearly 11 feet high. Railing was not included in the project quantities. <br /> <br /> The Committee recommended that the City Attorney advise the City Council of the <br /> _ responsibility of the consulting engineer in these oversights. Additionally, it was recommended <br />F"'/ that the consulting firm provide a letter of explanation with regard to these overages. I <br />x,,_ Council Action: <br /> Motion to ratify the recommendation of the Public Works Committee. <br /> Case#4: ~D~s;ussion of Extending Median on County Road #116 east of Trunk Highway I <br /> The Committee reviewed the comments received at the February 13, 200I public hearing. The I <br /> Committee recommended that the Commissioner of Transportation conduct a study to determine <br /> the proper speed limit of County Road #116 east of Trunk Highway 47. The Committee also <br /> recommended that the scope of the work for the County Road #116 Corridor Study also include a <br /> ~task to review and make a recommendation as to the access into the commercial strip mails <br /> 'adjacent to the County Road #116 and Trunk Highway 47 intersection. <br /> ~k,x Council Action: I <br /> Motion to ratify the recommendation of the Public Works Committee. I <br /> Case #5: Consider Initiating Action on the Vacating of Certain Streets <br /> Three street segments which have n° appar~ude the f°ll°win=:( -~O .~f~- ~..~ 9. I <br /> <br /> 2.. 150t Avenue NW west of Xkimo Street NW . <br /> 3. 152"d Avenue NW west of Salish StreetNW ,' t I <br /> The Committee recommended that the public hearing on the vacation of ~e~e ~ <br /> street segments be <br /> scheduled ~ ~, o · ,,o O <br /> <br /> Motion to ratify the rec{)mmendation of the Public Works Committee. I <br /> <br />-124- <br /> <br />Review by: <br /> <br />City Administrator <br />Public Works Director <br /> <br />CC: 07/24/01 '' <br /> <br />'&RA_FSl\VObl\users~Ci~y Shared File~ublic Works Department\CommitteeskPublic Works Commirtee\Casesk2OOl\CouncJl Update\cc <br />07.24.01 .doc <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />